The Presence of Hurthle Cells Does Not Increase the Risk of Malignancy in Most Bethesda Categories in Thyroid Fine-Needle Aspirates
Authors
Ren, YinKyriazidis, Natalia
Faquin, William C.
Soylu, Selen
Kamani, Dipti
Saade, Rayan
Torchia, Nicole
Lubitz, Carrie
Davies, Louise
Stathatos, Nikolaos
Stephen, Antonia E.
Randolph, Gregory W.
Faculty Advisor
Gregory RandolphDocument Type
Journal ArticlePublication Date
2020-03-11Keywords
Bethesda System for Reporting Thyroid CytopathologyHürthle cell
fine-needle aspiration
oncocytes
rate of malignancy
thyroid malignancy
Analytical, Diagnostic and Therapeutic Techniques and Equipment
Cells
Endocrine System
Endocrine System Diseases
Medical Cell Biology
Medical Education
Medical Pathology
Neoplasms
Pathology
Metadata
Show full item recordAbstract
Background: Hurthle cell/oncocytic change is commonly reported on thyroid fine-needle aspiration (FNA) and may be considered an "atypical cell" by clinicians. This study aims to delineate the association between Hurthle cells in preoperative cytology and subsequent pathology of the indexed thyroid nodule and to report rates of malignancy. Methods: Retrospective review of records of 300 patients with Hurthle cell/oncocytic change on FNA and final surgical pathology at a tertiary referral center between 2000 and 2013 was performed and compared with a multi-institutional FNA cohort. The degree of Hurthle cell presence was correlated with histopathologic diagnoses. Results: In the Hurthle cell FNA group, Bethesda System for Reporting Thyroid Cytopathology (BSRTC) categories were as follows: I (nondiagnostic) 14 (4.7%); II (benign) 113 (37.7%); III (atypia of undetermined significance/follicular lesion of undetermined significance) 33 (11%); IV (follicular neoplasm/suspicious for a follicular neoplasm) 125 (41.6%); V (suspicious for malignancy) 12 (4%); and VI (malignant) 3 (1%). When categorized based on the degree of Hurthle cell change, 59 (29%) were classified as mild, 13 (6%) moderate, and 131 (65%) as predominant. When comparing the results with a multi-institutional FNA cohort (all with surgical confirmation), the presence of Hurthle cells was found to be associated with a lower risk of malignancy in all BSRTC categories, with a statistically significant difference in the BSRTC IV and V groups. The sole exception was when Hurthle cell presence was classified as predominant (defined as > 75% of the cellular population); the rate of malignancy was significantly elevated in FNAs interpreted as benign/Bethesda II. Conclusions: Although Hurthle cells have been considered by clinicians as an "atypical cell," their presence does not increase the risk of malignancy within BSRTC categories overall. However, when predominant Hurthle cell change is present, the risk of malignancy is increased in the benign cytology/BSRTC category II.Source
Ren Y, Kyriazidis N, Faquin WC, Soylu S, Kamani D, Saade R, Torchia N, Lubitz C, Davies L, Stathatos N, Stephen AE, Randolph GW. The Presence of Hürthle Cells Does Not Increase the Risk of Malignancy in Most Bethesda Categories in Thyroid Fine-Needle Aspirates. Thyroid. 2020 Mar;30(3):425-431. doi: 10.1089/thy.2019.0190. PMID: 32013786; PMCID: PMC7476384. Link to article on publisher's site
DOI
10.1089/thy.2019.0190Permanent Link to this Item
http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14038/49362PubMed ID
32013786Notes
Natalia Kyriazidis participated in this study as a medical student in the Senior Scholars research program at the University of Massachusetts Medical School.
Related Resources
ae974a485f413a2113503eed53cd6c53
10.1089/thy.2019.0190