Critical impact of radiotherapy protocol compliance and quality in the treatment of advanced head and neck cancer: results from TROG 02.02
Department of Radiation Oncology
Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Carcinoma, Squamous Cell; Cisplatin; Clinical Trials as Topic; Combined Modality Therapy; Follow-Up Studies; *Guideline Adherence; Head and Neck Neoplasms; Humans; International Agencies; Neoplasm Recurrence, Local; Neoplasm Staging; *Quality Assurance, Health Care; Radiotherapy Dosage; Survival Rate; Treatment Outcome; Triazines
Neoplasms | Oncology
PURPOSE: To report the impact of radiotherapy quality on outcome in a large international phase III trial evaluating radiotherapy with concurrent cisplatin plus tirapazamine for advanced head and neck cancer.
PATIENTS AND METHODS: The protocol required interventional review of radiotherapy plans by the Quality Assurance Review Center (QARC). All plans and radiotherapy documentation underwent post-treatment review by the Trial Management Committee (TMC) for protocol compliance. Secondary review of noncompliant plans for predicted impact on tumor control was performed. Factors associated with poor protocol compliance were studied, and outcome data were analyzed in relation to protocol compliance and radiotherapy quality.
RESULTS: At TMC review, 25.4% of the patients had noncompliant plans but none in which QARC-recommended changes had been made. At secondary review, 47% of noncompliant plans (12% overall) had deficiencies with a predicted major adverse impact on tumor control. Major deficiencies were unrelated to tumor subsite or to T or N stage (if N+), but were highly correlated with number of patients enrolled at the treatment center (< five patients, 29.8%; > or = 20 patients, 5.4%; P < .001). In patients who received at least 60 Gy, those with major deficiencies in their treatment plans (n = 87) had a markedly inferior outcome compared with those whose treatment was initially protocol compliant (n = 502): -2 years overall survival, 50% v 70%; hazard ratio (HR), 1.99; P < .001; and 2 years freedom from locoregional failure, 54% v 78%; HR, 2.37; P < .001, respectively.
CONCLUSION: These results demonstrate the critical importance of radiotherapy quality on outcome of chemoradiotherapy in head and neck cancer. Centers treating only a few patients are the major source of quality problems.
DOI of Published Version
J Clin Oncol. 2010 Jun 20;28(18):2996-3001. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2009.27.4498.Link to article on publisher's site
Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology
Peters, Lester J.; O'Sullivan, Brian; Giralt, Jordi; Fitzgerald, Thomas J.; Trotti, Andy; Bernier, Jacques; Bourhis, Jean; Yuen, Kally; Fisher, Richard; and Rischin, Danny, "Critical impact of radiotherapy protocol compliance and quality in the treatment of advanced head and neck cancer: results from TROG 02.02" (2010). Radiation Oncology Publications and Presentations. 58.