Junior faculty members' mentoring relationships and their professional development in U.S. medical schools
Department of Quantitative Health Sciences
Faculty, Medical; Female; Humans; Male; Mentors; Questionnaires; Research; United States
Biostatistics | Epidemiology | Health Services Research
PURPOSE: To determine (1) the prevalence of mentoring relationships for U.S. medical school junior faculty; (2) the quality of these mentoring relationships; (3) any variation by gender or race; and (4) the relationship between mentoring and junior faculty members' perceptions of institutional professional support; research-, teaching-, and clinical-skills development; allocation of time to professional activities; and career satisfaction.
METHOD: In 1995 a 177-item survey was mailed to 3,013 full-time faculty at 24 randomly selected U.S. medical schools stratified on an area of medical specialization, graduation cohort, and gender. Mentoring was defined as "dynamic reciprocal relationship between an advanced career incumbent (the mentor) and a junior faculty member (the protege) aimed at fostering the development of the junior person/protege." Because mentoring is most crucial for junior faculty, the study focused on mentoring relationships within the previous three years ("recent mentoring") for faculty who were not full professors. Chisquare tests, analysis of variance, and principal-components analysis were used to analyze the data.
RESULTS: In all, 1,808 (60%) of the 3,013 faculty surveyed, of whom 72% were junior faculty, returned completed questionaires. Fifty-four percent of the junior faculty had had a recent mentoring relationship. There was no significant difference between the men and the women faculty or between majority and minority faculty in the prevalence and quality of the mentoring relationships. The faculty with mentors rated their research preparation and research skills higher than did the faculty without mentors. Most of the women faculty (80%) and the minority faculty (86%) who had had mentors reported that it was not important to have a mentor of the same gender or minority group.
CONCLUSION: Mentoring relationships are prevalent in academic medicine and should be promoted to support the career growth of junior faculty.
Acad Med. 1998 Mar;73(3):318-23. Link to article on publisher's site
Academic medicine : journal of the Association of American Medical Colleges
Palepu, Anita; Friedman, Robert H.; Barnett, Rosalind C.; Carr, Phyllis L.; Ash, Arlene S.; Szalacha, Laura; and Moskowitz, Mark A., "Junior faculty members' mentoring relationships and their professional development in U.S. medical schools" (1998). Quantitative Health Sciences Publications and Presentations. 676.