Context is everything: psychological data and consent to research

UMMS Affiliation

Department of Psychiatry

Publication Date


Document Type

Response or Comment


*Clinical Trials as Topic; *Decision Making; Humans; *Informed Consent; Research Subjects; *Theory of Mind; *Therapeutic Misconception


Mental and Social Health | Psychiatry | Psychiatry and Psychology | Social Control, Law, Crime, and Deviance

DOI of Published Version



Hastings Cent Rep. 2014 Jan-Feb;44(1):35-6. doi: 10.1002/hast.254. Link to article on publisher's site

Journal/Book/Conference Title

The Hastings Center report


Issues associated with consent to clinical trials have attracted considerable attention recently, spurred in part by controversies over alleged inadequacies in the consent process. Professor Jansen's interesting essay is unusual in two ways. First, it raises issues about the conceptualization of one set of problems in informed consent (which Jansen subsumes under the term “therapeutic error”) and, more critically, about the methods and the data used to assess them. Second, she is unique in using the findings of academic experimental psychology to critique the empirical findings. This produces a thoughtful and original critique of the process of informed consent to research that, nonetheless, we believe, yields a model that does not reflect the reality of clinical research.

Related Resources

Link to Article in PubMed

PubMed ID