Exploring the Concept of “Young Carer” in Families Living with Parental Mental Illness
UMass Chan Affiliations
Department of Psychiatry, Center for Mental Health Services ResearchDocument Type
PosterPublication Date
2008-10-01Keywords
CaregiversChild of Impaired Parents
Child
Siblings
Family Relations
Mental Disorders
Mentally Ill Persons
Parental Mental Illness
young carers
child protection services
Health Services Research
Mental and Social Health
Psychiatric and Mental Health
Psychiatry
Psychiatry and Psychology
Metadata
Show full item recordAbstract
Background Information: The concept of “young carers” has been framed in the literature as children providing care and assuming household responsibilities when parents have physical and/or mental disabilities (Aldridge & Becker, 2003). In the United Kingdom, young carers have been studied extensively, leading to increased access to services and supports (Dearden & Becker, 2004). Our goal is to explore the concept of young carers in the U.S. Aims: 1) To describe the care giving and household responsibilities of children and youth living with parents with mental illnesses, how often they are performed, and the feelings of children and youth about these responsibilities. In addition, we are exploring the daily activities and interactions of children and youth; and 2) To assess the feasibility and usefulness of certain measures for use with younger children. Methods: Data were obtained in baseline interviews conducted with children and youth participating in the Family Options study. Interview data were obtained from 47 children and youth between the ages of 8 and 16 years at the time of entry into the study. The sample is balanced in terms of gender. The majority of the children are white. About half had ever had an IEP. Over two thirds had ever had any emotional/behavioral problems. The majority had been involved with child protection services. Interviews included questions from a structured measure used in previous research on young carers (Aldridge & Becker, 1993) and open-ended interview items from the Behavioral and Emotional Rating Scale-2nd Ed. (BERS-2; Mooney, Epstein, Ryser, & Pierce, 2005). Results: Most of the children and youth reported having responsibilities such as helping to provide care for their mother (82%), helping mom get ready to go out (58%), and helping mom to get up in the morning (50%). Children also reported doing chores such as washing dishes (60%), helping with laundry (69%), and helping with sweeping, vacuuming or dusting (84%). Most children (95%) said the amount of work they had to do around the house seemed fair to them and that they felt appreciated for this work (91%). Ninety-four percent of children and youth indicated they spend time “doing things they like.” Also, about half (51%) indicated they would like to be doing more of these activities. Almost ninety percent (89%) reported they spend time playing or hanging out with friends. Interviewers noted that children’s ages may have affected their interpretation of some of the questions. Also, parents were often nearby while children were being interviewed, which may have influenced children’s responses. Discussion: While children perform care giving and other responsibilities in the home, these responsibilities seem to be balanced with engagement in personal activities and friendships. Further research might explore children’s attitudes about their responsibilities in relation to their parents’ illnesses and their relationships with their parents, as well as their perceptions of the balance between these responsibilities and their personal activities. Recommendations for the future include interviewing children without their parents present and providing additional clarification for younger children on the meaning of questions regarding care giving and household responsibilities.Source
Seligowski, A., McNamee, P., Albert, K., Williams, V., & Nicholson, J. (2008). Exploring the concept of “Young Carer” in families living with parental mental illness. Poster presented at the 3rd Annual UMMS Psychiatry Research Day, Worcester, MA, October.
DOI
10.13028/ng18-t757Permanent Link to this Item
http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14038/45392Rights
Copyright the Author(s)ae974a485f413a2113503eed53cd6c53
10.13028/ng18-t757
Scopus Count
Collections
Related items
Showing items related by title, author, creator and subject.
-
A Public Health Framework for the State Mental Health Authority: A Call for Action by Massachusetts Consumers and Family MembersDelman, Jonathan (2006-01-01)During the Spring of 2006, Consumer Quality Initiatives (CQI) conducted 20 focus groups across the state, 12 with adults with mental illness, 3 with parents of youth with serious emotional disorder, 2 with youth with SED, 1 with family members of adult consumers, and 2 with youth in transition. Supported by a contract with Massachusetts Department of Mental Health (DMH), the goal was to assist DMH in framing the criteria for its upcoming reprocurement. Our findings reveal a frustration with an approach to health care delivery that focuses primarily on the provision of psychiatric care (egs, medication, therapy, hospitalization). We reviewed the focus group reports to identify the most significant themes, which clustered within eight broad categories.
-
Rights, wrongs, and the dilemma of coerced community treatmentGeller, Jeffrey L. (1986-10-01)An outpatient treatment approach directed to patients with histories of psychotically based dangerousness, poor compliance, and recidivism is described. Cases are presented that suggest favorable outcomes of this approach, but the coercive nature of the treatment raises questions about the psychiatrist's violation of patients' rights and transgression of ethical standards. If psychiatrists are to successfully treat the most difficult chronic patients, can we do it without legally sanctioned, benevolent, coercive treatments? One model of such treatment is outpatient commitment. There is concern that without sound outpatient commitment statutes, we may witness the reemergence of asylums.
-
Promoting the Health of Parents & Children: Addressing Perinatal Mental Health by Building Medical Provider Capacity Through Perinatal Psychiatry Access ProgramsByatt, Nancy; Bergman, Aaron; Maslin, Melissa C. T.; Forkey, Heather; Griffin, Jessica L.; Moore Simas, Tiffany A. (2020-11-03)Mental health conditions are the most common obstetric complications of the perinatal period, impacting 1 in 5 individuals during pregnancy and the year following pregnancy. Perinatal mental health (PMH) conditions have deleterious effects on the health of perinatal individuals and their children, and are a leading and preventable cause of maternal mortality. Nevertheless, PMH conditions are underrecognized, underdiagnosed, and undertreated. To address these gaps, Massachusetts created the Massachusetts Child Psychiatry Access Program (MCPAP) for Moms to build the capacity of frontline medical providers to address PMH conditions by providing education, consultation, and resources and referrals. MCPAP for Moms has emerged as a successful and scalable model with at least 25 states or organizations implementing or developing similar Perinatal Psychiatry Access Programs. This report summarizes the Perinatal Psychiatry Access Program model and its individual and national impact.