Title
The new research ethic: will oversight requirements sink forensic research
UMMS Affiliation
Department of Psychiatry
Publication Date
2005-09-28
Document Type
Article
Subjects
Clinical Protocols; Costs and Cost Analysis; Ethics Committees, Research; *Ethics, Research; Forensic Psychiatry; Government Regulation; Guideline Adherence; Human Experimentation; Humans; United States; United States Dept. of Health and Human Services
Disciplines
Health Services Research | Mental and Social Health | Psychiatry | Psychiatry and Psychology
Abstract
The conduct of research with human participants is facing increased scrutiny from government, media, and academic sources. Research oversight is consequently increasing dramatically as education and accreditation movements gain momentum. Institutional review boards themselves are undergoing significant changes in organization and accountability, implementing new tools to monitor investigator compliance. This article describes the causes of recent calls for increased scrutiny, the resultant trends in research oversight, and the general lack of preparation for increased costs in the public sector. These are costs that will be felt acutely in the forensic setting as diminishing state budgets affect hospitals, universities, and correctional institutions.
Source
J Am Acad Psychiatry Law. 2005;33(3):361-7. Link to article on publisher's website
Journal/Book/Conference Title
The journal of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law
Related Resources
PubMed ID
16186201
Repository Citation
Candilis, Philip J.; Arikan, Rasim; Noone, Sheila B.; and Holzer, Jacob C., "The new research ethic: will oversight requirements sink forensic research" (2005). Implementation Science and Practice Advances Research Center Publications. 393.
https://escholarship.umassmed.edu/psych_cmhsr/393
