Commentary: civil commitment statutes--40 years of circumvention

UMMS Affiliation

Department of Psychiatry

Publication Date


Document Type

Response or Comment


Commitment of Mentally Ill


Health Services Research | Mental and Social Health | Psychiatric and Mental Health | Psychiatry | Psychiatry and Psychology


There is a longstanding body of literature that describes how states' civil commitment statutes have been stretched or circumvented to accommodate institutional and systemic needs. The paper by Levitt and colleagues provides yet another example of this phenomenon: Arizona's use of its civil commitment statutes to detain unrestorable, incompetent criminal defendants for whom other provisions have not been developed. This commentary provides a brief overview of other examples of the stretching of commitment laws, providing a broader context for viewing the findings of Levitt and colleagues.

Rights and Permissions

Citation: J Am Acad Psychiatry Law. 2010;38(3):365-8.

Journal/Book/Conference Title

The journal of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law

Related Resources

Link to Article in PubMed

PubMed ID