UMMS Affiliation

Program in Systems Biology; Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Pharmacology; Program in Molecular Medicine; Diabetes Center of Excellence; Graduate School of Biomedical Sciences

Publication Date

2021-09-03

Document Type

Article

Disciplines

Biochemistry, Biophysics, and Structural Biology | Genetics and Genomics

Abstract

Chromosome conformation capture (3C) assays are used to map chromatin interactions genome-wide. Chromatin interaction maps provide insights into the spatial organization of chromosomes and the mechanisms by which they fold. Hi-C and Micro-C are widely used 3C protocols that differ in key experimental parameters including cross-linking chemistry and chromatin fragmentation strategy. To understand how the choice of experimental protocol determines the ability to detect and quantify aspects of chromosome folding we have performed a systematic evaluation of 3C experimental parameters. We identified optimal protocol variants for either loop or compartment detection, optimizing fragment size and cross-linking chemistry. We used this knowledge to develop a greatly improved Hi-C protocol (Hi-C 3.0) that can detect both loops and compartments relatively effectively. In addition to providing benchmarked protocols, this work produced ultra-deep chromatin interaction maps using Micro-C, conventional Hi-C and Hi-C 3.0 for key cell lines used by the 4D Nucleome project.

Keywords

Genomic analysis, Genomics

Rights and Permissions

© The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Nature America, Inc. 2021. Open Access: This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.

DOI of Published Version

10.1038/s41592-021-01248-7

Source

Akgol Oksuz B, Yang L, Abraham S, Venev SV, Krietenstein N, Parsi KM, Ozadam H, Oomen ME, Nand A, Mao H, Genga RMJ, Maehr R, Rando OJ, Mirny LA, Gibcus JH, Dekker J. Systematic evaluation of chromosome conformation capture assays. Nat Methods. 2021 Sep;18(9):1046-1055. doi: 10.1038/s41592-021-01248-7. Epub 2021 Sep 3. PMID: 34480151; PMCID: PMC8446342. Link to article on publisher's site

Journal/Book/Conference Title

Nature methods

Comments

This article is based on a previously available preprint on bioRxiv that is also available in eScholarship@UMMS.

Related Resources

Link to Article in PubMed

PubMed ID

34480151

Creative Commons License

Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.

Share

COinS