Comparison of On-Site Versus Remote Mobile Device Support in the Framingham Heart Study Using the Health eHeart Study for Digital Follow-up: Randomized Pilot Study Set Within an Observational Study Design
Department of Medicine, Division of Cardiovascular Medicine
Cardiology | Cardiovascular Diseases | Clinical Epidemiology | Epidemiology | Health Services Administration | Telemedicine
BACKGROUND: New electronic cohort (e-Cohort) study designs provide resource-effective methods for collecting participant data. It is unclear if implementing an e-Cohort study without direct, in-person participant contact can achieve successful participation rates.
OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to compare 2 distinct enrollment methods for setting up mobile health (mHealth) devices and to assess the ongoing adherence to device use in an e-Cohort pilot study.
METHODS: We coenrolled participants from the Framingham Heart Study (FHS) into the FHS-Health eHeart (HeH) pilot study, a digital cohort with infrastructure for collecting mHealth data. FHS participants who had an email address and smartphone were randomized to our FHS-HeH pilot study into 1 of 2 study arms: remote versus on-site support. We oversampled older adults (age > /=65 years), with a target of enrolling 20% of our sample as older adults. In the remote arm, participants received an email containing a link to enrollment website and, upon enrollment, were sent 4 smartphone-connectable sensor devices. Participants in the on-site arm were invited to visit an in-person FHS facility and were provided in-person support for enrollment and connecting the devices. Device data were tracked for at least 5 months.
RESULTS: Compared with the individuals who declined, individuals who consented to our pilot study (on-site, n=101; remote, n=93) were more likely to be women, highly educated, and younger. In the on-site arm, the connection and initial use of devices was > /=20% higher than the remote arm (mean percent difference was 25% [95% CI 17-35] for activity monitor, 22% [95% CI 12-32] for blood pressure cuff, 20% [95% CI 10-30] for scale, and 43% [95% CI 30-55] for electrocardiogram), with device connection rates in the on-site arm of 99%, 95%, 95%, and 84%. Once connected, continued device use over the 5-month study period was similar between the study arms.
CONCLUSIONS: Our pilot study demonstrated that the deployment of mobile devices among middle-aged and older adults in the context of an on-site clinic visit was associated with higher initial rates of device use as compared with offering only remote support. Once connected, the device use was similar in both groups.
cell phone, electrocardiography, epidemiology, fitness trackers, wearable electronic devices
Rights and Permissions
Copyright © Nicole L Spartano, Honghuang Lin, Fangui Sun, Kathryn L Lunetta, Ludovic Trinquart, Maureen Valentino, Emily S Manders, Mark J Pletcher, Gregory M Marcus, David D McManus, Emelia J Benjamin, Caroline S Fox, Jeffrey E Olgin, Joanne M Murabito. Originally published in JMIR Mhealth and Uhealth (http://mhealth.jmir.org), 30.09.2019. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work, first published in JMIR mhealth and uhealth, is properly cited. The complete bibliographic information, a link to the original publication on http://mhealth.jmir.org/, as well as this copyright and license information must be included.
DOI of Published Version
JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2019 Sep 30;7(9):e13238. doi: 10.2196/13238. Link to article on publisher's site
JMIR mHealth and uHealth
Spartano NL, Lin H, Sun F, Lunetta KL, Trinquart L, Valentino M, Manders ES, Pletcher MJ, Marcus GM, McManus DD, Benjamin EJ, Fox CS, Olgin JE, Murabito JM. (2019). Comparison of On-Site Versus Remote Mobile Device Support in the Framingham Heart Study Using the Health eHeart Study for Digital Follow-up: Randomized Pilot Study Set Within an Observational Study Design. Open Access Publications by UMass Chan Authors. https://doi.org/10.2196/13238. Retrieved from https://escholarship.umassmed.edu/oapubs/3991
Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.