Division of Organ Transplantation, Department of Surgery; Department of Microbiology and Physiological Systems; Department of Medicine, Division of Gastroenterology; Department of Pathology
Surgery | Surgical Procedures, Operative
Background: It remains controversial if arterial perfusion in addition to portal vein perfusion during machine preservation improves liver graft quality. Comparative studies using both techniques are lacking. We studied the impact of using single or dual machine perfusion of donation after circulatory death rat livers. In addition, we analyzed the effect of pulsatile versus continuous arterial flow.
Methods: Donation after circulatory death rat livers (n = 18) were preserved by 6 hours cold storage, followed by 1 hour subnormothermic machine perfusion (20 degrees C, pressure of 40/5 mm Hg) and 2 hours ex vivo warm reperfusion (37 degrees C, pressure of 80/11 mm Hg, 9% whole blood). Machine preservation was either through single portal vein perfusion (SP), dual pulsatile (DPP), or dual continuous perfusion (DCP) of the portal vein and hepatic artery. Hydrodynamics, liver function tests, histopathology, and expression of endothelial specific genes were assessed during 2 hours warm reperfusion.
Results: At the end of reperfusion, arterial flow in DPP livers tended to be higher compared to DCP and SP grafts. However, this difference was not significant nor was better flow associated with better outcome. No differences in bile production or alanine aminotransferase levels were observed. SP livers had significantly lower lactate compared to DCP, but not DPP livers. Levels of Caspase-3 and tumor necrosis factor-alpha were similar between the groups. Expression of endothelial genes Kruppel-like-factor 2 and endothelial nitric oxide synthase tended to be higher in dual perfused livers, but no histological evidence of better preservation of the biliary endothelium or vasculature of the hepatic artery was observed.
Conclusions: This study shows comparable outcomes after using a dual or single perfusion approach during end-ischemic subnormothermic liver machine preservation.
liver grafts, perfusion
Rights and Permissions
Copyright © 2018 The Author(s). Transplantation Direct. Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Non Commercial-No Derivatives License 4.0 (CCBY-NC-ND), where it is permissible to download and share the work provided it is properly cited. The work cannot be changed in any way or used commercially without permission from the journal.
DOI of Published Version
Transplant Direct. 2018 Oct 23;4(11):e400. doi: 10.1097/TXD.0000000000000840. eCollection 2018 Nov. Link to article on publisher's site
Bruggenwirth IM, Moore C, Mahboub P, Thijssen MF, E X, Leuvenink HG, Mandrekar P, Wang X, Kowalik TF, Porte RJ, Martins PN. (2018). A Comparative Study of Single and Dual Perfusion During End-ischemic Subnormothermic Liver Machine Preservation. Open Access Publications by UMass Chan Authors. https://doi.org/10.1097/TXD.0000000000000840. Retrieved from https://escholarship.umassmed.edu/oapubs/3685
Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-No Derivative Works 4.0 License.