Deciding about hormone therapy: validation of a model

UMMS Affiliation

Meyers Primary Care Institute; Department of Family Medicine and Community Health

Publication Date


Document Type



Adult; Cohort Studies; *Decision Making; *Decision Support Techniques; Estrogen Replacement Therapy; Female; Humans; Interviews as Topic; Middle Aged; Questionnaires; Reproducibility of Results; Tape Recording; *Women's Health


Health Services Research | Primary Care


OBJECTIVE: The purposes of this study were to (1) validate components of a decision process regarding adoption of hormone therapy and (2) compare the decision processes women used with respect to their evaluation of decision quality.

DESIGN: A sample of women participating in a population-based study of midlife women's health participated in individual in-depth interviews.

RESULTS: Content analysis of 30 recorded interviews provided evidence that each component of the decision process (precontemplation, contemplation, commitment, critical evaluation, and continuance) was replicated. Few additional codes were identified, and these could be subsumed under the phases of the original decision model.

CONCLUSIONS: Women's self-reported statuses on a screening questionnaire corresponded to the stages of the decision model coded from their interviews. What women actually decided to do (use hormone therapy or something else) was not associated with their decision process. Satisfaction with the decision, uncertainty about the decision, and other factors related to the decision were independent of the decision phases.


Menopause. 1998 Spring;5(1):52-9.

Journal/Book/Conference Title

Menopause (New York, N.Y.)


At the time of publication, Barry Saver was not yet affiliated with the University of Massachusetts Medical School.

Related Resources

Link to Article in PubMed

PubMed ID