UMMS Affiliation

Lamar Soutter Library

Publication Date

2019-10-01

Document Type

Article

Disciplines

Health Sciences and Medical Librarianship | Scholarly Communication | Scholarly Publishing

Abstract

Objective: This study uses survey research methods to gain a deeper understanding of the institutional repository (IR) landscape in medical schools and academic health centers.

Methods: Members of the Association of Academic Health Sciences Libraries (AAHSL) were surveyed about their IRs. The authors used a mixed-methods approach of a survey and qualitative content analysis to identify common themes.

Results: Survey results indicate that a large majority of responding medical schools and academic health centers have or are implementing an IR (35 out of 50, 70%). Of these, 60% (21 institutions) participate in an institution-wide IR rather than administer their own repositories. Much of the archived content is grey literature that has not already been published, but the percentage of original content varies greatly among institutions. The majority (57.1%) of respondent institutions are not considering an open access policy or mandate. Most institutions (71.4%) reported that repository staff are depositing materials on behalf of users. DSpace and bepress Digital Commons are the most popular repository platforms in this community. The planned enhancements that were most frequently reported were implementing a discovery layer and ORCID integration. The majority of respondents (54.3%) do not plan to migrate to a different platform in the foreseeable future. Analysis of respondent comments identified the following themes: integration, redundancy, and reporting; alternatives and exploration; uniqueness; participation; and funding and operations.

Conclusions: The study results capture a view of the IR landscape in medical schools and academic health centers and help readers understand what services their peers have in place as well as their plans for future developments.

Keywords

institutional repository, institutional repositories, IRs, health sciences, medical schools

Rights and Permissions

Copyright : © 2019, Authors. Articles in this journal are licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

DOI of Published Version

10.5195/jmla.2019.653

Source

Kipnis DG, Palmer LA, Kubilius RK. The institutional repository landscape in medical schools and academic health centers: a 2018 snapshot view and analysis. J Med Libr Assoc. 2019 Oct;107(4):488-498. doi: 10.5195/jmla.2019.653. Epub 2019 Oct 1. PubMed PMID: 31607806; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC6774547. Link to article on publisher's website

Journal/Book/Conference Title

Journal of the Medical Library Association : JMLA

Related Resources

Link to article in PubMed. DATA AVAILABILITY STATEMENT: The de-identified dataset and supporting files are available in the University of Massachusetts Medical School’s institutional repository, eScholarship@UMMS, at https://doi.org/10.13028/4t76-4325.

PubMed ID

31607806

Creative Commons License

Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.

jmla-107-488-s001.pdf (166 kB)
Appendix A: Survey instrument

jmla-107-488-s002.pdf (106 kB)
Appendix B: Tables 2 and 3

Share

COinS
 
 

To view the content in your browser, please download Adobe Reader or, alternately,
you may Download the file to your hard drive.

NOTE: The latest versions of Adobe Reader do not support viewing PDF files within Firefox on Mac OS and if you are using a modern (Intel) Mac, there is no official plugin for viewing PDF files within the browser window.