ORCID ID

https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4325-3959

Publication Date

2020-12-03

Document Type

Master's Thesis

Academic Program

Master of Science in Clinical Investigation

Department

Division of Pulmonary, Allergy and Critical Care Medicine, Department of Medicine; Division of Health Informatics and Implementation Science, Department of Population and Quantitative Health Sciences

First Thesis Advisor

Kathleen Mazor, EdD

Keywords

Share decision making, Lung cancer screening, Health informatics, mHealth, Implementation Science, Co-production

Abstract

Background: Shared decision-making (SDM) counseling for lung cancer screening is recommended by multiple professional societies and mandated by the Center for Medicare and Medicaid Services since lung cancer screening has both benefits and risks. However, uptake of SDM counseling as well as lung cancer screening itself remain low. We sought to develop educational text messages about lung cancer screening as an innovative implementation intervention tool to promote patient-provider discussion about lung cancer screening.

Methods: After the study team drafted educational text messages about lung cancer screening, informed by existing decision aids, participants who had had lung cancer screening were recruited and asked to review and edit text messages. After that, participants eligible for lung cancer screening without the previous screening experience were recruited and were asked to select the messages to be included in this text message intervention. The final set of 14 text messages were delivered to the participants both with and without the previous lung cancer screening over a period of 14 days. Participants completed a telephone survey assessing their reactions to the messages after receiving the last message.

Results: We successfully involved twelve participants with lung cancer screening experience and eleven lung cancer screening eligible participants without previous screening experience in the development of educational text messages about lung cancer screening. After one participant withdrew, 22 participants received text messages and completed the survey regarding the messages. Most participants (18 of 22) reported reading all 14 text messages, however most recommended sending fewer messages (median recommended number of messages = 10). Participants found the educational text messages informative. Only four participants reported the text messages triggered anxiety and two reported text messages disrupted their daily activities. Participants perceived the text messages would empower patients to discuss lung cancer screening with their providers.

Conclusion: Participants generally supported the use of educational text messages about lung cancer screening to increase patients’ awareness and promote patient-provider discussion. Engaging patients in the development and evaluation of text messages elicited helpful feedback that will inform the content of the messages to be delivered via this lung cancer screening text messages intervention.

DOI

10.13028/qpw9-gg56

Rights and Permissions

Copyright is held by the author, with all rights reserved.

Available for download on Saturday, December 03, 2022

Share

COinS