What the ANPRM missed: additional needs for IRB reform
Department of Psychiatry
Bioethics and Medical Ethics
Institutional Review Boards are mandated to carry out the requirements of the Common Rule, and it is widely agreed that they are appropriate and necessary mechanisms to ensure the ethical conduct of human research. In this paper, we suggest that the changes proposed in ANPRM, although generally helpful, fail to take into consideration how IRBs actually review applications and therefore do not adequately address some of the problems that may be leading to ineffective human subject protection.
IRB, Institutional Review Board
DOI of Published Version
Lidz, C. W. and Garverich, S. (2013), What the ANPRM Missed: Additional Needs for IRB Reform. The Journal of Law, Medicine & Ethics, 41: 390–396. doi: 10.1111/jlme.12050. Link to article on publisher's site
The Journal of law, medicine and ethics : a journal of the American Society of Law, Medicine and Ethics
Lidz, Charles W. and Garverich, Suzanne, "What the ANPRM missed: additional needs for IRB reform" (2013). University of Massachusetts Medical School Faculty Publications. 266.