Modern treatment of tibial shaft fractures: Is there a role today for closed treatment
Name:
Publisher version
View Source
Access full-text PDFOpen Access
View Source
Check access options
Check access options
UMass Chan Affiliations
Department of Orthopedics and Physical RehabilitationDocument Type
Journal ArticlePublication Date
2020-10-05
Metadata
Show full item recordAbstract
PURPOSE: The decision to attempt closed treatment on tibial shaft fractures can be challenging. At our institution, we attempt treatment of nearly all closed, isolated tibial shaft fractures. The purpose of this study was to report the results of 10 years of experience to develop a tool to identify patients for whom non-operative treatment of tibial shaft fractures may be a viable option. METHOD: This was a retrospective review of patients with tibial shaft fracture seen at a level 1 trauma center over 10 years. Patients with closed, isolated injuries underwent sedation, closed reduction, long-leg casting, and outpatient follow-up. Patients were converted to surgery for inability to obtain or maintain acceptable alignment or patient intolerance. Radiographic characteristics and patient demographics were extracted. Logistic regression analysis was used to develop a model to predict which patient and injury characteristics determined success of nonoperative treatment. RESULTS: 334 patients were identified with isolated, closed tibial shaft fractures, who were reduced and treated in a long leg cast. 234 patients (70%) converted to surgical treatment due to inability to maintain alignment, patient intolerance, and nonunion. In a regression model, coronal/sagittal translation, sagittal angulation, fracture morphology, and smoking status were shown to be significant predictors of success of nonoperative treatment (p < 0.05). We developed a Tibial Operative Outcome Likelihood (TOOL) score designed to help predict success or failure of closed treatment. The TOOL score can be used to identify a subsegment of patients with injuries amenable to closed treatment (38% of injuries) with a nonoperative success rate over 60%. CONCLUSION: Non-operative treatment of tibial shaft fractures is feasible, although there is a relatively high conversion rate to operative treatment. However, it is possible to use injury characteristics to identify a cohort of patients with a higher chance of success with closed treatment, which is potentially useful in a resource-constrained setting or for patients who wish to avoid surgery. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Prognostic Level 3.Source
Swart E, Lasceski C, Latario L, Jo J, Nguyen UDT. Modern treatment of tibial shaft fractures: Is there a role today for closed treatment? Injury. 2020 Oct 5:S0020-1383(20)30816-0. doi: 10.1016/j.injury.2020.10.018. Epub ahead of print. PMID: 33046252; PMCID: PMC7534823. Link to article on publisher's site
DOI
10.1016/j.injury.2020.10.018Permanent Link to this Item
http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14038/29609PubMed ID
33046252Related Resources
ae974a485f413a2113503eed53cd6c53
10.1016/j.injury.2020.10.018