<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" ?>
<rss version="2.0">
<channel>
<title>Transfusion Medicine Publications and Presentations</title>
<copyright>Copyright (c) 2013 University of Massachusetts Medical School All rights reserved.</copyright>
<link>http://escholarship.umassmed.edu/transfusion_pp</link>
<description>Recent documents in Transfusion Medicine Publications and Presentations</description>
<language>en-us</language>
<lastBuildDate>Wed, 13 Feb 2013 18:53:50 PST</lastBuildDate>
<ttl>3600</ttl>








<item>
<title>Guidelines on the use of therapeutic apheresis in clinical practice--evidence-based approach from the Apheresis Applications Committee of the American Society for Apheresis.</title>
<link>http://escholarship.umassmed.edu/transfusion_pp/7</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://escholarship.umassmed.edu/transfusion_pp/7</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 01 Jul 2010 06:19:48 PDT</pubDate>
<description>
	<![CDATA[
	<p>The American Society for Apheresis (ASFA) Apheresis Applications Committee is charged with a review and categorization of indications for therapeutic apheresis. Beginning with the 2007 ASFA Special Issue (fourth edition), the subcommittee has incorporated systematic review and evidence-based approach in the grading and categorization of indications. This Fifth ASFA Special Issue has further improved the process of using evidence-based medicine in the recommendations by refining the category definitions and by adding a grade of recommendation based on widely accepted GRADE system. The concept of a fact sheet was introduced in the Fourth edition and is only slightly modified in this current edition. The fact sheet succinctly summarizes the evidence for the use of therapeutic apheresis. The article consists of 59 fact sheets devoted to each disease entity currently categorized by the ASFA as category I through III. Category IV indications are also listed.</p>

	]]>
</description>

<author>Zbigniew M. Szczepiorkowski et al.</author>


<category>Blood Component Removal</category>

<category>Evidence-Based Practice</category>

<category>Practice Guideline</category>

<category>Plasma Exchange</category>

<category>Leukapheresis</category>

<category>Photopheresis</category>

</item>






<item>
<title>Evidence-based apheresis makes the GRADE.</title>
<link>http://escholarship.umassmed.edu/transfusion_pp/6</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://escholarship.umassmed.edu/transfusion_pp/6</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 01 Jul 2010 06:19:47 PDT</pubDate>
<description>
	<![CDATA[
	
	]]>
</description>

<author>Robert Weinstein</author>


<category>Blood Component Removal</category>

<category>Evidence-Based Practice</category>

<category>Practice Guideline</category>

<category>Plasma Exchange</category>

<category>Leukapheresis</category>

<category>Photopheresis</category>

</item>






<item>
<title>Evidence of seriousness in apheresis medicine</title>
<link>http://escholarship.umassmed.edu/transfusion_pp/4</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://escholarship.umassmed.edu/transfusion_pp/4</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 15 Mar 2010 07:07:22 PDT</pubDate>
<description>
	<![CDATA[
	
	]]>
</description>

<author>Robert Weinstein</author>


<category>*Blood Component Removal</category>

<category>Humans</category>

<category>Societies, Medical</category>

</item>






<item>
<title>Category IV indications for therapeutic apheresis: ASFA fourth special issue</title>
<link>http://escholarship.umassmed.edu/transfusion_pp/5</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://escholarship.umassmed.edu/transfusion_pp/5</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 15 Mar 2010 07:07:22 PDT</pubDate>
<description>
	<![CDATA[
	<p>The American Society for Apheresis (ASFA) Committee on Clinical Applications systematically and critically reviews published information on the use of therapeutic apheresis in clinical practice. On the basis of this review, selected diseases are assigned one of five categories (category I, II, III, IV, and P). The diseases, which were classified as category IV indications, and the rationale for such assignment are reviewed in this article. The diseases assigned to category I, II, III, and newly created category P are discussed in a separate article in this issue.</p>

	]]>
</description>

<author>Beth H. Shaz et al.</author>


<category>*Blood Component Removal</category>

<category>Disease</category>

<category>Humans</category>

<category>Practice Guidelines as Topic</category>

<category>Societies, Medical</category>

<category>United States</category>

</item>






<item>
<title>Guidelines on the use of therapeutic apheresis in clinical practice: evidence-based approach from the Apheresis Applications Committee of the American Society for Apheresis</title>
<link>http://escholarship.umassmed.edu/transfusion_pp/3</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://escholarship.umassmed.edu/transfusion_pp/3</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 15 Mar 2010 07:07:20 PDT</pubDate>
<description>
	<![CDATA[
	<p>The American Society for Apheresis (ASFA) Apheresis Applications Committee is charged with a review and categorization of indications for therapeutic apheresis. This elaborate process had been undertaken every 7 years resulting in three prior publications in 1986, 1993, and 2000 of "The ASFA Special Issues." This article is the integral part of the Fourth ASFA Special Issue. The Fourth ASFA Special Issue is significantly modified in comparison to the previous editions. A new concept of a fact sheet has been introduced. The fact sheet succinctly summarizes the evidence for the use of therapeutic apheresis. A detailed description of the fact sheet is provided. The article consists of 53 fact sheets devoted to each disease entity currently categorized by the ASFA. Categories I, II, and III are defined as previously in the Third Special Issue. However, a few new therapeutic apheresis modalities, not yet approved in the United States or are currently in clinical trials, have been assigned category P (pending) by the ASFA Clinical Categories Subcommittee. The diseases assigned to category IV are discussed in a separate article in this issue.</p>

	]]>
</description>

<author>Zbigniew M. Szczepiorkowski et al.</author>


<category>*Blood Component Removal</category>

<category>Evidence-Based Medicine</category>

<category>Female</category>

<category>Humans</category>

<category>Male</category>

<category>United States</category>

</item>






<item>
<title>Selective leukocyte apheresis for the treatment of inflammatory bowel disease</title>
<link>http://escholarship.umassmed.edu/transfusion_pp/2</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://escholarship.umassmed.edu/transfusion_pp/2</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 15 Mar 2010 07:07:19 PDT</pubDate>
<description>
	<![CDATA[
	<p>The etiology of inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) is not completely understood, thus current therapies have been empirical and directed at treating symptoms rather than addressing the cause. In IBD, the overexpression of proinflammatory cytokines, such as tumor necrosis factor-alpha, interleukin-1beta, interleukin-6, leads to a persistent intestinal inflammatory response that damages the intestinal mucosa. Recent advances in pharmacologic therapies that target specific cytokines, chemokines, and adhesion molecules have proved successful in alleviating symptoms for some patients. There are 2 selective adsorption apheresis devices that remove leukocytes from whole blood, which are currently available in Japan and Europe-the Cellsorba leukocytapheresis column and the Adacolumn adsorptive extracorporeal granulocyte/monocyte apheresis device. The purported mechanisms of action of these devices have been extensively reviewed and are believed to exert an immunomodulatory and/or anti-inflammatory effect on patients with systemic inflammatory disease. The clinical trials presented here indicate that selective leukocyte apheresis effectively removes activated granulocytes and monocytes/macrophages from peripheral blood while maintaining an excellent safety profile. Despite these findings, large controlled trials of selective leukocyte apheresis in the treatment of IBD are needed to determine the true efficacy of this approach.</p>

	]]>
</description>

<author>Maria T. Abreu et al.</author>


<category>Clinical Trials as Topic</category>

<category>Colitis, Ulcerative</category>

<category>Crohn Disease</category>

<category>Granulocytes</category>

<category>Humans</category>

<category>Inflammation</category>

<category>Inflammatory Bowel Diseases</category>

<category>Leukapheresis</category>

<category>Monocytes</category>

<category>Multicenter Studies as Topic</category>

<category>Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic</category>

<category>Treatment Outcome</category>

</item>






<item>
<title>Therapeutic apheresis in neurological disorders: a survey of the evidence in support of current category I and II indications for therapeutic plasma exchange</title>
<link>http://escholarship.umassmed.edu/transfusion_pp/1</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://escholarship.umassmed.edu/transfusion_pp/1</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 15 Mar 2010 07:07:17 PDT</pubDate>
<description>
	<![CDATA[
	<p>Neurologic disorders constitute the largest group of indications for therapeutic plasma exchange. Although some of the traditional indications are supported by properly designed randomized trials, others are not. This article provides a critical look at the evidence in support of the assignment by ASFA of Category I or II indications to neurologic disorders in its most recent (2007) evaluation of therapeutic apheresis.</p>

	]]>
</description>

<author>Robert Weinstein</author>


<category>Blood Component Removal</category>

<category>Humans</category>

<category>Nervous System Diseases</category>

<category> *Plasma Exchange</category>

<category> *Practice Guidelines as Topic</category>

</item>





</channel>
</rss>
