Title

Perioperative mortality for management of hepatic neoplasm: a simple risk score

UMMS Affiliation

Department of Surgery

Date

10-27-2009

Document Type

Article

Medical Subject Headings

Aged; Female; Follow-Up Studies; Hepatectomy; Hospital Mortality; Humans; Liver Neoplasms; Male; Middle Aged; Postoperative Period; Prognosis; Retrospective Studies; Risk Assessment; Risk Factors; Survival Rate; United States

Disciplines

Surgery

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To develop a population-based risk score for stratifying patients by risk of in-hospital mortality following procedural intervention for hepatic neoplasm.

BACKGROUND: There has been growing support for the value of surgical management of hepatic neoplastic disease, both primary and metastatic. Advances in surgical and ablative technologies have contributed to a decrease in the mortality associated with these procedures. However, multiple patient-, disease- and treatment-related factors can contribute to perioperative morbidity and mortality.

METHODS: Using the Nationwide Inpatient Sample from 1998 to 2005, a retrospective cohort of patient-discharges for hepatic procedures with a concurrent diagnosis of hepatic primary or metastatic neoplasm to the liver was assembled. Procedures were categorized as lobectomy, wedge resection, or enucleation/ablation. Logistic regression and bootstrap methods were used to create an integer score for estimating the risk of in-hospital mortality using patient demographics, comorbidities, procedure type, tumor type, and hospital characteristics. A randomly selected sample of 80% of the cohort was used to create the risk score. Testing was conducted in the remaining 20% validation-set.

RESULTS: In total, 12,969 patient-discharges were identified. Overall in-hospital mortality was 3.45%. Predictive characteristics incorporated into the model included: age, sex, Charlson comorbidity score, procedure type, hospital type, and type of neoplasm. Integer values were assigned to these, and used to calculate an additive score. Five clinically relevant groups were assembled to stratify risk, with a 36-fold gradient in mortality. Rates in the groups were as follows: 0.9%, 2.5%, 6.8%, 17.6%, and 35.9%. In the derivation set, as well as in the validation set, the simple score discriminated well, with c-statistics of 0.76 and 0.70, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS: An integer-based risk score can be used to predict in-hospital mortality after hepatic procedure for neoplasm, and may be useful for preoperative risk stratification and patient counseling.

Rights and Permissions

Citation: Ann Surg. 2009 Dec;250(6):929-34. Link to article on publisher's site

Related Resources

Link to Article in PubMed

PubMed ID

19855257