Improving Delivery of Evidence-Based Prenatal Care in a Family Medicine Clinic
Faculty Advisor
Jeremy GoldingUMass Chan Affiliations
Department of Family Medicine and Community HealthDocument Type
PosterPublication Date
2011-05-02Keywords
Evidence-Based MedicineEvidence-Based Practice
Prenatal Care
Pregnancy
Clinical Protocols
Community Health and Preventive Medicine
Life Sciences
Maternal and Child Health
Medicine and Health Sciences
Obstetrics and Gynecology
Preventive Medicine
Metadata
Show full item recordAbstract
Background: According to the Institute of Medicine, using evidence-based decision-making is one of the key principles that will enable the health care system to provide consistent, high-quality medical care to all people. This can be a challenge when providing care to pregnant women, as ethical issues regarding research in this population have resulted in a relative dearth of high quality randomized control trials providing evidence for prenatal issues. The challenge of providing evidence-based prenatal care is further compounded in a busy Family Medicine teaching practice where pregnant women represent a relatively small fraction of the patients seen on a daily basis. Purpose: The purpose of this project was to develop concise, evidence-based protocols for the management of several common prenatal problems and implement them in a Family Medicine clinic in order to improve the quality of care provided to pregnant women in this practice. Methods: First, four common prenatal problems were identified: 1) Obesity in Pregnancy; 2) Prior Preterm Labor; 3) Gestational Diabetes; and 4) Chronic Hypertension in Pregnancy. For each of these problems, a comprehensive review of the literature was performed. Priority was given to guidelines from professional organizations, meta-analyses and randomized control trials. Using the strongest evidence from all of these sources, a one-page protocol was developed for each condition. The protocols then underwent a review process by the physicians at the clinic. In areas where no strong evidence existed, medico-legal considerations and consensus-derived provider preferences were incorporated into the protocols. Results: In each of the four problems of interest, there existed at least one recommendation that had strong evidence to support it. These recommendations included screening tools, counseling topics and pharmacologic interventions. Conclusions: The first phase of this project has resulted in the development of concise, evidence-based protocols for care of patients with four common prenatal problems that can now be instituted in the Family Medicine clinic. These protocols incorporate the strongest evidence available, and on issues where no strong evidence is available, they take into consideration medico-legal issues and provider preferences derived from a consensus process. We hope that the availability of these protocols will result in more consistent, evidence-based prenatal care. The next steps will be to assess provider utilization of and satisfaction with the protocols, as well as gather outcomes data to see if the implementation of these protocols results in better patient outcomes.DOI
10.13028/hxwq-mr31Permanent Link to this Item
http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14038/49178Notes
Medical student Rachel Rosenberg participated in this study as part of the Senior Scholars research program at the University of Massachusetts Medical School.
Rights
Copyright is held by the author(s), with all rights reserved.ae974a485f413a2113503eed53cd6c53
10.13028/hxwq-mr31
Scopus Count
Collections
Related items
Showing items related by title, author, creator and subject.
-
Integrative Medicine in a Preventive Medicine Residency: A Program for the Urban UnderservedBerz, Jonathan P.B.; Gergen Barnett, Katherine A.; Gardiner, Paula; Saper, Robert B. (2015-11-01)The Preventive Medicine Residency Program collaborated with the Department of Family Medicine's Program for Integrative Medicine and Health Disparities at Boston Medical Center to create a new rotation for preventive medicine residents starting in autumn 2012. Residents participated in integrative medicine group visits and consults, completed an online curriculum in dietary supplements, and participated in seminars all in the context of an urban safety net hospital. This collaboration was made possible by a federal Health Resources and Services Administration grant for integrative medicine in preventive medicine residencies and helped meet a need of the program to increase residents' exposure to clinical preventive medicine and integrative health clinical skills and principles. The collaboration has resulted in a required rotation for all residents that continues after the grant period and has fostered additional collaborations related to integrative medicine across the programs.
-
Family medicine residency program directors attitudes and knowledge of family medicine CAM competenciesGardiner, Paula; Filippelli, Amanda C.; Lebensohn, Patricia; Bonakdar, Robert (2013-09-01)CONTEXT: Little is known about the incorporation of integrative medicine (IM) and complementary and alternative medicine (CAM) into family medicine residency programs. OBJECTIVE: The Society for Teachers of Family Medicine (STFM) approved a set of CAM/IM competencies for family medicine residencies. We hope to evaluate whether residency programs are implementing such competencies into their curriculum using an online survey tool. We also hope to assess the knowledge and attitudes of Residency Directors (RDs) on the CAM/IM competencies. DESIGN: A survey was distributed by the Council of Academic Family Medicine (CAFM) Educational Research Alliance to RDs via e-mail. The survey was distributed to 431 RDs. Of those who received it, 212 responded, giving a response rate of 49.1%. Questions assessed the knowledge and attitudes of CAM/IM competencies and incorporation of CAM/IM into the residency curriculum. RESULTS: Forty-five percent of RDs were aware of the competencies. In terms of RD attitudes, 58% reported that CAM/IM is an important component of residents' curriculum; yet, 60% report not having specific learning objectives for CAM/IM in their residency curriculum. Among all programs, barriers to CAM/IM implementation included time in residents' schedules (77%); faculty training (75%); access to CAM experts (43%); lack of reimbursement (43%); and financial resources (29%). CONCLUSIONS: While many RDs are aware of the STFM CAM/IM competencies and acknowledge their role in residence education, there are many barriers that prevent residencies from implementing the STFM CAM/IM competencies.
-
The incorporation of stress management programming into family medicine residencies-results of a national survey of residency directors: a CERA studyGardiner, Paula; Filippelli, Amanda C.; Lebensohn, Patricia; Bonakdar, Robert (2015-04-01)BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Residents' stress and burnout is a concern among family medicine residency programs. Our objective is to assess stress management options available to family medicine residents. METHODS: In 2012, the Council of Academic Family Medicine Educational Research Alliance (CERA) e-mailed a survey to US residency directors. Questions were asked on four types of stress management programming (SMP): (1) access to counselors, social workers, or mental health providers, (2) residency support or Balint groups, (3) stress management lectures or workshops, and (4) residency retreats. We assessed how many programs contained all four types of SMP and their relationship to the following topics: stress management techniques for patients, spirituality, mind/body techniques, and self-care for residents. RESULTS: Of the 212 responses, 29% reported having all four types of SMP. Eighty-three percent reported stress management lectures or workshops, and 79% reported residency retreats. Smaller and mid-size residencies (36%) and residencies in the West (36%) were more likely to have all four types of SMP. There was a correlation between having didactics, clinical rotations, and electives on stress management techniques for patient care and having stress management lectures or workshops for residents. There was statistical significance between having resident self-care curriculum and (1) having retreats and (2) stress management lectures or workshops. CONCLUSIONS: It is necessary to evaluate whether residency programs are providing appropriate stress management skills for residents that will improve physician wellness and patient outcomes.