Title

Yield of retinal examination in suspected physical abuse with normal neuroimaging

UMMS Affiliation

Department of Pediatrics

Date

4-14-2010

Document Type

Article

Medical Subject Headings

Brain Injuries; Child Abuse; Cohort Studies; Cross-Sectional Studies; Diagnostic Imaging; Female; Fractures, Bone; Glasgow Coma Scale; Humans; Infant; Male; Retinal Hemorrhage; *Retinoscopy; Retrospective Studies; Sensitivity and Specificity; United States

Disciplines

Pediatrics

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: In some centers, dedicated ophthalmologic examination is performed for all children who are evaluated for potential physical abuse. Although retinal hemorrhages have been reported in rare cases of abused children with normal neuroimaging results, the utility of ophthalmologic examination in this group is currently unknown. The objective of this study was to determine the prevalence of retinal hemorrhages in children younger than 2 years who were evaluated for physical abuse and who had no evidence of traumatic brain injury (TBI) on neuroimaging.

PATIENTS AND METHODS: We performed retrospective analysis of data obtained from 1676 children younger than 5 years who were evaluated for potential physical abuse as a part of the Using Liver Transaminases to Recognize Abuse research network. We reviewed results of dedicated ophthalmologic examination in all children younger than 2 years with no evidence of TBI on neuroimaging.

RESULTS: Among 282 children who met inclusion criteria, only 2 (0.7% [95% confidence interval: 0.1%-2.5%]) had retinal hemorrhages considered "characteristic" of abuse. Seven other children (2.5% [95% confidence interval: 1.0%-5.1%]) had a nonspecific pattern of retinal hemorrhages. Both children with characteristic retinal hemorrhages in the absence of TBI showed evidence of head or facial injury on physical examination and/or altered mental status.

CONCLUSIONS: In children younger than 2 years being evaluated for physical abuse without radiographic evidence of brain injury, retinal hemorrhages are rare. Dedicated ophthalmologic examination should not be considered mandatory in this population.

Rights and Permissions

Citation: Pediatrics. 2010 May;125(5):e1066-71. Epub 2010 Apr 12. Link to article on publisher's site

Related Resources

Link to Article in PubMed