<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" ?>
<rss version="2.0">
<channel>
<title>Education/Residency</title>
<copyright>Copyright (c) 2013 University of Massachusetts Medical School All rights reserved.</copyright>
<link>http://escholarship.umassmed.edu/peds_education</link>
<description>Recent documents in Education/Residency</description>
<language>en-us</language>
<lastBuildDate>Wed, 13 Feb 2013 17:57:18 PST</lastBuildDate>
<ttl>3600</ttl>








<item>
<title>Teaching about schools during pediatric residency</title>
<link>http://escholarship.umassmed.edu/peds_education/2</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://escholarship.umassmed.edu/peds_education/2</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 14 Jun 2012 09:12:00 PDT</pubDate>
<description>
	<![CDATA[
	<p>OBJECTIVE: Several published guidelines have suggested that primary care pediatricians include school issues as part of regular health supervision visits. Few residency training programs include systematic education about educational issues that affect children's lives and success in school. The goal of this study was to evaluate a short curriculum on Children In School that was included as part of the 2-month required rotation in developmental-behavioral pediatrics.</p>
<p>METHODS: A questionnaire was designed to assess 1) pediatric residents' attitudes about the importance of making school issues part of their practice, 2) pediatric residents' self-perceived knowledge about central concepts, and 3) pediatric residents' self-perceived skills.Participants.-Twenty-one of the 22 pediatric residents in 1 training program completed the questionnaire at the beginning of their first residency year and again during the final 3 months of their third (last) year.</p>
<p>RESULTS: Residents assessed that their knowledge and skills relating to children in school were increased consistently (P < .001). Because they considered pediatricians' responsibilities to help improve children's school success to be important even before the program, there was little opportunity for improvement in ratings of "importance" over time.</p>
<p>CONCLUSIONS: A relatively short teaching module introduced in the context of the developmental-behavioral pediatrics rotation can improve residents' self-assessed skills and knowledge about children in school.</p>

	]]>
</description>

<author>Susan Starr et al.</author>


<category>Adult</category>

<category>Attitude of Health Personnel</category>

<category>*Clinical Competence</category>

<category>*Curriculum</category>

<category>Education, Medical, Graduate</category>

<category>Female</category>

<category>Health Care Surveys</category>

<category>Humans</category>

<category>*Internship and Residency</category>

<category>Male</category>

<category>Pediatrics</category>

<category>Physician&apos;s Practice Patterns</category>

<category>Physician&apos;s Role</category>

<category>Probability</category>

<category>Quality of Health Care</category>

<category>Questionnaires</category>

<category>*School Health Services</category>

<category>Sensitivity and Specificity</category>

<category>United States</category>

</item>






<item>
<title>Resident preparedness for practice: a longitudinal cohort study</title>
<link>http://escholarship.umassmed.edu/peds_education/1</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://escholarship.umassmed.edu/peds_education/1</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 14 Jun 2012 09:11:58 PDT</pubDate>
<description>
	<![CDATA[
	<p>OBJECTIVE: To determine whether the perception of preparedness for practice changes over time.</p>
<p>DESIGN: Questionnaire survey of University of Massachusetts residents 5 years after an initial survey. Responses to individual questions in the 2 surveys were compared for each graduate and the Wilcoxon rank sum test applied. A supplementary questionnaire addressed current confidence in areas with relatively low scores in both surveys.</p>
<p>RESULTS: All 24 eligible graduates responded. The high rating of overall sense of preparedness was identical in the 2 surveys. Differences were statistically significant in only 3 categories: common illnesses, office gastroenterology, and office gynecology-all from a lower estimate of preparedness initially to a higher estimate in retrospect. Six areas continued to receive relatively low scores: nutrition, patient scheduling, cost-effectiveness, telephone management, office gynecology, and office orthopedics. Respondents feel more confident currently with nutrition, patient scheduling, and telephone management but not with cost-effectiveness, gynecology, or orthopedics.</p>
<p>CONCLUSIONS: Residents paired with office-based practitioners for their continuity experience report feeling well prepared for practice both on practice entry and 5 to 9 years later. In the 6 areas of relatively low preparedness, experience improved confidence with nutrition, patient scheduling, and telephone management, but not cost-effectiveness, gynecology, or orthopedics. The hypothesis that clinical areas of relative weakness at the end of residency may remain so years later deserves to be tested.</p>

	]]>
</description>

<author>Kenneth B. Roberts et al.</author>


<category>Clinical Competence</category>

<category>Data Collection</category>

<category>Education, Medical, Continuing</category>

<category>Education, Medical, Graduate</category>

<category>Humans</category>

<category>Internship and Residency</category>

<category>Longitudinal Studies</category>

<category>Pediatrics</category>

<category>Professional Practice</category>

<category>United States</category>

</item>





</channel>
</rss>
