<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" ?>
<rss version="2.0">
<channel>
<title>Nickerson Lab</title>
<copyright>Copyright (c) 2013 University of Massachusetts Medical School All rights reserved.</copyright>
<link>http://escholarship.umassmed.edu/nickerson</link>
<description>Recent documents in Nickerson Lab</description>
<language>en-us</language>
<lastBuildDate>Thu, 16 May 2013 11:34:11 PDT</lastBuildDate>
<ttl>3600</ttl>








<item>
<title>The human nucleolar protein FTSJ3 associates with NIP7 and functions in pre-rRNA processing</title>
<link>http://escholarship.umassmed.edu/nickerson/6</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://escholarship.umassmed.edu/nickerson/6</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 30 Mar 2012 07:57:27 PDT</pubDate>
<description>
	<![CDATA[
	<p>NIP7 is one of the many trans-acting factors required for eukaryotic ribosome biogenesis, which interacts with nascent pre-ribosomal particles and dissociates as they complete maturation and are exported to the cytoplasm. By using conditional knockdown, we have shown previously that yeast Nip7p is required primarily for 60S subunit synthesis while human NIP7 is involved in the biogenesis of 40S subunit. This raised the possibility that human NIP7 interacts with a different set of proteins as compared to the yeast protein. By using the yeast two-hybrid system we identified FTSJ3, a putative ortholog of yeast Spb1p, as a human NIP7-interacting protein. A functional association between NIP7 and FTSJ3 is further supported by colocalization and coimmunoprecipitation analyses. Conditional knockdown revealed that depletion of FTSJ3 affects cell proliferation and causes pre-rRNA processing defects. The major pre-rRNA processing defect involves accumulation of the 34S pre-rRNA encompassing from site A' to site 2b. Accumulation of this pre-rRNA indicates that processing of sites A0, 1 and 2 are slower in cells depleted of FTSJ3 and implicates FTSJ3 in the pathway leading to 18S rRNA maturation as observed previously for NIP7. The results presented in this work indicate a close functional interaction between NIP7 and FTSJ3 during pre-rRNA processing and show that FTSJ3 participates in ribosome synthesis in human cells.</p>

	]]>
</description>

<author>Luis G. Morello et al.</author>


<category>Nuclear Proteins</category>

<category>Ribosomes</category>

<category>RNA Precursors</category>

<category>Protein Biosynthesis</category>

</item>






<item>
<title>Pulse energy dependence of subcellular dissection by femtosecond laser pulses</title>
<link>http://escholarship.umassmed.edu/nickerson/5</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://escholarship.umassmed.edu/nickerson/5</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 23 Feb 2011 08:19:03 PST</pubDate>
<description>
	<![CDATA[
	<p>Precise dissection of cells with ultrashort laser pulses requires a clear understanding of how the onset and extent of ablation (i.e., the removal of material) depends on pulse energy. We carried out a systematic study of the energy dependence of the plasma-mediated ablation of fluorescently-labeled subcellular structures in the cytoskeleton and nuclei of fixed endothelial cells using femtosecond, near-infrared laser pulses focused through a high-numerical aperture objective lens (1.4 NA). We find that the energy threshold for photobleaching lies between 0.9 and 1.7 nJ. By comparing the changes in fluorescence with the actual material loss determined by electron microscopy, we find that the threshold for true material ablation is about 20% higher than the photobleaching threshold. This information makes it possible to use the fluorescence to determine the onset of true material ablation without resorting to electron microscopy. We confirm the precision of this technique by severing a single microtubule without disrupting the neighboring microtubules, less than 1 micrometer away.</p>

	]]>
</description>

<author>A. Heisterkamp et al.</author>


<category>Actins</category>

<category>Animals</category>

<category>Cell Nucleus</category>

<category>Cytoskeleton</category>

<category>Endothelial Cells</category>

<category> *Lasers</category>

<category>Microscopy, Electron, Transmission</category>

<category>Microscopy, Fluorescence</category>

<category>Microtubules</category>

<category>Radiation Dosage</category>

</item>






<item>
<title>Proteomic analysis of SRm160-containing complexes reveals a conserved association with cohesin</title>
<link>http://escholarship.umassmed.edu/nickerson/4</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://escholarship.umassmed.edu/nickerson/4</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 23 Feb 2011 08:19:02 PST</pubDate>
<description>
	<![CDATA[
	<p>In this study, we describe a rapid immunoaffinity purification procedure for gel-free tandem mass spectrometry-based analysis of endogenous protein complexes and apply it to the characterization of complexes containing the SRm160 (serine/arginine repeat-related nuclear matrix protein of 160 kDa) splicing coactivator. In addition to promoting splicing, SRm160 stimulates 3'-end processing via its N-terminal PWI nucleic acid-binding domain and is found in a post-splicing exon junction complex that has been implicated in coupling splicing with mRNA turnover, export, and translation. Consistent with these known functional associations, we found that the majority of proteins identified in SRm160-containing complexes are associated with pre-mRNA processing. Interestingly, SRm160 is also associated with factors involved in chromatin regulation and sister chromatid cohesion, specifically the cohesin subunits SMC1alpha, SMC3, RAD21, and SA2. Gradient fractionation suggested that there are two predominant SRm160-containing complexes, one enriched in splicing components and the other enriched in cohesin subunits. Co-immunoprecipitation and co-localization experiments, as well as combinatorial RNA interference in Caenorhabditis elegans, support the existence of conserved and functional interactions between SRm160 and cohesin.</p>

	]]>
</description>

<author>Susan McCracken et al.</author>


<category>Animals</category>

<category>Antigens, Nuclear</category>

<category>Caenorhabditis elegans</category>

<category>Cell Cycle Proteins</category>

<category>Chromosomal Proteins, Non-Histone</category>

<category>Fungal Proteins</category>

<category>Hela Cells</category>

<category>Humans</category>

<category>Immunoprecipitation</category>

<category>Mass Spectrometry</category>

<category>Nuclear Matrix-Associated Proteins</category>

<category>Nuclear Proteins</category>

<category>Protein Binding</category>

<category> *Proteome</category>

<category>RNA Splicing</category>

<category>RNA, Messenger</category>

<category>RNA-Binding Proteins</category>

</item>






<item>
<title>Methods for measuring rates of protein binding to insoluble scaffolds in living cells: histone H1-chromatin interactions</title>
<link>http://escholarship.umassmed.edu/nickerson/3</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://escholarship.umassmed.edu/nickerson/3</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 23 Feb 2011 08:19:01 PST</pubDate>
<description>
	<![CDATA[
	<p>Understanding of cell regulation is limited by our inability to measure molecular binding rates for proteins within the structural context of living cells, and many systems biology models are hindered because they use values obtained with molecules binding in solution. Here, we present a kinetic analysis of GFP-histone H1 binding to chromatin within nuclei of living cells that allows both the binding rate constant k(ON) and dissociation rate constant k(OFF) to be determined based on data obtained from fluorescence recovery after photobleaching (FRAP) analysis. This is accomplished by measuring the ratio of bound to free concentration of protein at steady state, and identifying the rate-determining step during FRAP recovery experimentally, combined with mathematical modeling. We report k(OFF) = 0.0131/s and k(ON) = 0.14/s for histone H1.1 binding to chromatin. This work brings clarity to the interpretation of FRAP experiments and provides a way to determine binding kinetics for nuclear proteins and other cellular molecules that interact with insoluble scaffolds within living cells.</p>

	]]>
</description>

<author>Tanmay Lele et al.</author>


<category>Animals</category>

<category>Cell Nucleus</category>

<category>Chromatin</category>

<category>Fluorescence Recovery After Photobleaching</category>

<category>Histones</category>

<category>Humans</category>

<category>Mathematics</category>

<category>Mice</category>

<category>Models, Theoretical</category>

<category>NIH 3T3 Cells</category>

<category>Protein Binding</category>

<category>Recombinant Fusion Proteins</category>

</item>






<item>
<title>The biochemistry of RNA metabolism studied in situ</title>
<link>http://escholarship.umassmed.edu/nickerson/2</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://escholarship.umassmed.edu/nickerson/2</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 23 Feb 2011 08:19:00 PST</pubDate>
<description>
	<![CDATA[
	<p>In vitro assays have contributed important insights into the mechanisms of RNA metabolism in cells. A growing collection of microscopy techniques is allowing the measurement of macromolecular binding and complex formation in the context of a real cell. We will first discuss two of the more established techniques. Fluorescence resonance energy transfer (FRET) identifies binding partners, pairs of molecules residing in the same macromolecular complexes. The complimentary technique of fluorescence recovery after photobleaching (FRAP) measures the rates of binding and unbinding of those molecules in their complexes. A newer technique--in vitro FRAP--assesses the regulation of binding and complex formation by co-factors in the nucleus.</p>

	]]>
</description>

<author>Jeffrey A. Nickerson</author>


<category>Adenosine Triphosphate</category>

<category>Animals</category>

<category>Biochemistry</category>

<category>Fluorescence Recovery After Photobleaching</category>

<category>Fluorescence Resonance Energy Transfer</category>

<category>Humans</category>

<category>Kinetics</category>

<category>Macromolecular Substances</category>

<category>Microscopy</category>

<category>Models, Biological</category>

<category>Molecular Biology</category>

<category>Protein Binding</category>

<category>RNA</category>

</item>






<item>
<title>Beta1 integrins mediate cell proliferation in three-dimensional cultures by regulating expression of the sonic hedgehog effector protein, GLI1</title>
<link>http://escholarship.umassmed.edu/nickerson/1</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://escholarship.umassmed.edu/nickerson/1</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 23 Feb 2011 08:18:59 PST</pubDate>
<description>
	<![CDATA[
	<p>The beta1 integrins play an important role in the modulation of cancer cell proliferation and tumor growth. We have previously shown that beta1 integrins associate with insulin-like growth factor type 1 receptor (IGF-IR) and regulate IGF-stimulated prostate cancer cell proliferation. In the present study, we find that downregulation of beta1 in prostate cancer cells inhibits IGF-IR and AKT activation. We also show that beta1 downregulation in two- and three-dimensional (3D) prostate cancer cell cultures significantly reduces expression of GLI1, a transcription factor known to be regulated by the IGF/AKT signaling pathway and to be a downstream effector of sonic hedgehog. Re-expression of GLI1 rescues the inhibitory effect of beta1 downregulation on prostate cancer cell proliferation in 3D cultures. We find that downregulation of beta1 significantly reduces surface expression of the associated alpha 5 integrin subunit. Our results indicate that the beta1/IGF-IR complex regulates expression of GLI1, which in turn promotes cancer cell proliferation in 3D cultures.</p>

	]]>
</description>

<author>Hira Lal Goel et al.</author>


<category>Antigens, CD29</category>

<category>Cell Culture Techniques</category>

<category>Cell Line, Tumor</category>

<category> *Cell Proliferation</category>

<category>Humans</category>

<category>Insulin-Like Growth Factor I</category>

<category>Integrin alpha5</category>

<category>Male</category>

<category>Phosphorylation</category>

<category>Prostatic Neoplasms</category>

<category>Proto-Oncogene Proteins c-akt</category>

<category>RNA Interference</category>

<category>Receptor, IGF Type 1</category>

<category>Recombinant Fusion Proteins</category>

<category>Signal Transduction</category>

<category>Transcription Factors</category>

<category>Transfection</category>

<category>Tyrosine</category>

</item>





</channel>
</rss>
