Adoption of once-monthly oral bisphosphonates and the impact on adherence
Name:
Publisher version
View Source
Access full-text PDFOpen Access
View Source
Check access options
Check access options
UMass Chan Affiliations
Department of Medicine, Division of RheumatologyMeyers Primary Care Institute
Document Type
Journal ArticlePublication Date
2010-03-03Keywords
Administration, OralAged
Bone Resorption
Diphosphonates
Drug Administration Schedule
Female
Humans
Male
*Medication Adherence
Middle Aged
Patient Compliance
Retrospective Studies
Health Services Research
Medicine and Health Sciences
Metadata
Show full item recordAbstract
BACKGROUND: The extent of the adoption of once-monthly bisphosphonates into general clinical practice is not known, nor is it known if the novel formulation improves adherence. METHODS: We analyzed administrative claims 2003-2006 from a large employer-based health insurance database for incident use of oral bisphosphonates and stratified users by daily, weekly, and monthly dosing regimen. We measured adherence as the medication possession ratio (MPR) during the first year of therapy. We compared patient characteristics by dosing regimen and evaluated how the dosing regimen influenced the MPR. RESULTS: We identified 61,125 incident users of bisphosphonates (n=1034 daily, n=56,925 weekly, n=3166 monthly). Monthly bisphosphonate users were, on average, slightly older than the other groups (mean age 66 years for monthly users vs 65 years for weekly users or 66 years for daily users, P<.05) and more often lived in the North Central or South United States (76% vs 72% weekly users or 69% daily users, P<.05). There were no detectable differences among the dosing groups in the history of serious gastrointestinal risk, comorbidity burden, or prior osteoporotic fractures. During the first year of bisphosphonate therapy, 49% of monthly users had MPR> or =80% compared with 49% of weekly users (not significant) or 23% of daily users (P<.0001). CONCLUSION: We found little evidence of preferential prescribing of monthly bisphosphonates to certain types of patients. Furthermore, we found no evidence of improved bisphosphonate adherence with monthly dosing relative to weekly dosing, although adherence with either weekly or monthly dosing was significantly better than with daily dosing.Source
Am J Med. 2010 Mar;123(3):275-80. Link to article on publisher's siteDOI
10.1016/j.amjmed.2009.05.017Permanent Link to this Item
http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14038/36856PubMed ID
20193837Related Resources
Link to Article in PubMedae974a485f413a2113503eed53cd6c53
10.1016/j.amjmed.2009.05.017