<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" ?>
<rss version="2.0">
<channel>
<title>Lawrence Lab</title>
<copyright>Copyright (c) 2013 University of Massachusetts Medical School All rights reserved.</copyright>
<link>http://escholarship.umassmed.edu/lawrence</link>
<description>Recent documents in Lawrence Lab</description>
<language>en-us</language>
<lastBuildDate>Fri, 17 May 2013 11:20:40 PDT</lastBuildDate>
<ttl>3600</ttl>








<item>
<title>Heterochromatin instability in cancer: From the Barr body to satellites and the nuclear periphery</title>
<link>http://escholarship.umassmed.edu/lawrence/8</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://escholarship.umassmed.edu/lawrence/8</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 04 Oct 2012 10:55:14 PDT</pubDate>
<description>
	<![CDATA[
	<p>In recent years it has been recognized that the development of cancer involves a series of not only genetic but epigenetic changes across the genome. At the same time, connections between epigenetic regulation, chromatin packaging, and overall nuclear architecture are increasingly appreciated. The cell-type specific organization of heterochromatin, established upon cell differentiation, is responsible for maintaining much of the genome in a repressed state, within a highly compartmentalized nucleus. This review focuses on recent evidence that in cancer the normal packaging and higher organization of heterochromatin is often compromised. Gross changes in nuclear morphology have long been a criterion for pathologic diagnosis of many cancers, but the specific nuclear components impacted, the mechanisms involved, and the implications for cancer progression have barely begun to emerge. We discuss recent findings regarding distinct heterochromatin types, including the inactive X chromosome, constitutive heterochromatin of peri/centric satellites, and the peripheral heterochromatic compartment (PHC). A theme developed here is that the higher-order organization of satellites and the peripheral heterochromatic compartment may be tightly linked, and that compromise of this organization may promote broad epigenomic imbalance in cancer. Recent studies into the potential role(s) of the breast cancer tumor suppressor, BRCA1, in maintaining heterochromatin will be highlighted. Many questions remain about this new area of cancer epigenetics, which is likely more important in cancer development and progression than widely appreciated. We propose that broad, stochastic compromise in heterochromatin maintenance would create a diversity of expression profiles, and thus a rich opportunity for one or more cells to emerge with a selective growth advantage and potential for neoplasia.</p>

	]]>
</description>

<author>Dawn M. Carone et al.</author>


<category>Heterochromatin</category>

<category>Neoplasms</category>

<category>DNA, Satellite</category>

<category>Epigenesis, Genetic</category>

<category>RNA, Untranslated</category>

<category>Genes, BRCA1</category>

</item>






<item>
<title>XIST RNA and Architecture of the Inactive X Chromosome: Implications for the Repeat Genome</title>
<link>http://escholarship.umassmed.edu/lawrence/7</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://escholarship.umassmed.edu/lawrence/7</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 19 May 2011 08:44:41 PDT</pubDate>
<description>
	<![CDATA[
	<p>XIST RNA paints and induces silencing of one X chromosome in mammalian female cells, providing a powerful model to investigate long-range chromosomal regulation. This chapter focuses on events downstream from the spread of XIST RNA across the interphase chromosome, to consider how this large noncoding RNA interacts with and silences a whole chromosome. Several lines of evidence are summarized that point to the involvement of repeat sequences in different aspects of the X-inactivation process. Although the "repeat genome" comprises close to half of the human genome, the potential for abundant repeats to contribute to genome regulation has been largely overlooked and may be underestimated. X inactivation has the potential to reveal roles of interspersed and other repeats in the genome. For example, evidence indicates that XIST RNA acts at the architectural level of the whole chromosome to induce formation of a silent core enriched for nongenic and repetitive (Cot-1) DNA, which corresponds to the DAPI-dense Barr body. Expression of repeat RNAs may contribute to chromosome remodeling, and evidence suggests that other types of repeat elements may be involved in escape from X inactivation. Despite great progress in decoding the rest of the genome, we suggest that the repeat genome may contain meaningful but complex language that remains to be better studied and understood.</p>

	]]>
</description>

<author>Lisa L. Hall et al.</author>


<category>RNA, Untranslated</category>

<category>X Chromosome Inactivation</category>

</item>






<item>
<title>The three-dimensional folding of the α-globin gene domain reveals formation of chromatin globules</title>
<link>http://escholarship.umassmed.edu/lawrence/6</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://escholarship.umassmed.edu/lawrence/6</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 15 Mar 2011 06:43:57 PDT</pubDate>
<description>
	<![CDATA[
	<p>We developed a general approach that combines chromosome conformation capture carbon copy (5C) with the Integrated Modeling Platform (IMP) to generate high-resolution three-dimensional models of chromatin at the megabase scale. We applied this approach to the ENm008 domain on human chromosome 16, containing the α-globin locus, which is expressed in K562 cells and silenced in lymphoblastoid cells (GM12878). The models accurately reproduce the known looping interactions between the α-globin genes and their distal regulatory elements. Further, we find using our approach that the domain folds into a single globular conformation in GM12878 cells, whereas two globules are formed in K562 cells. The central cores of these globules are enriched for transcribed genes, whereas nontranscribed chromatin is more peripheral. We propose that globule formation represents a higher-order folding state related to clustering of transcribed genes around shared transcription machineries, as previously observed by microscopy.</p>

	]]>
</description>

<author>Davide Bau et al.</author>


<category>Chromatin</category>

<category>Chromosomes, Human, Pair 16</category>

<category>Humans</category>

<category>In Situ Hybridization, Fluorescence</category>

<category>K562 Cells</category>

<category>Models, Molecular</category>

<category>Nucleic Acid Conformation</category>

<category>alpha-Globins</category>

</item>






<item>
<title>Inducible XIST-dependent X-chromosome inactivation in human somatic cells is reversible</title>
<link>http://escholarship.umassmed.edu/lawrence/5</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://escholarship.umassmed.edu/lawrence/5</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 15 Mar 2011 06:28:06 PDT</pubDate>
<description>
	<![CDATA[
	<p>During embryogenesis, the XIST RNA is expressed from and localizes to one X chromosome in females and induces chromosome-wide silencing. Although many changes to inactive X heterochromatin are known, the functional relationships between different modifications are not well understood, and studies of the initiation of X-inactivation have been largely confined to mouse. We now present a model system for human XIST RNA function in which induction of an XIST cDNA in somatic cells results in localized XIST RNA and transcriptional silencing. Chromatin immunoprecipitation and immunohistochemistry shows that this silencing need only be accompanied by a subset of heterochromatic marks and that these can differ between integration sites. Surprisingly, silencing is XIST-dependent, remaining reversible over extended periods. Deletion analysis demonstrates that the first exon of human XIST is sufficient for both transcript localization and the induction of silencing and that, unlike the situation in mice, the conserved repeat region is essential for both functions. In addition to providing mechanistic insights into chromosome regulation and formation of facultative heterochromatin, this work provides a tractable model system for the study of chromosome silencing and suggests key differences from mouse embryonic X-inactivation.</p>

	]]>
</description>

<author>Jennifer C. Chow et al.</author>


<category>Chromatin Immunoprecipitation</category>

<category>Chromosomes, Human, X</category>

<category>DNA Methylation</category>

<category>DNA, Complementary</category>

<category>*Dosage Compensation, Genetic</category>

<category>Doxycycline</category>

<category>Fibrosarcoma</category>

<category>Gene Silencing</category>

<category>Heterochromatin</category>

<category>Histones</category>

<category>Humans</category>

<category>Immunohistochemistry</category>

<category>In Situ Hybridization, Fluorescence</category>

<category>Models, Genetic</category>

<category>*RNA, Untranslated</category>

<category>Sequence Analysis, DNA</category>

<category>*X Chromosome Inactivation</category>

</item>






<item>
<title>The disappearing Barr body in breast and ovarian cancers</title>
<link>http://escholarship.umassmed.edu/lawrence/4</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://escholarship.umassmed.edu/lawrence/4</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 15 Mar 2011 06:28:05 PDT</pubDate>
<description>
	<![CDATA[
	<p>Interest has recently reawakened in whether loss of the heterochromatic X chromosome (Barr body) is prevalent in certain breast and ovarian cancers, and new insights into the mechanisms involved have emerged. Mitotic segregation errors commonly explain the loss of the inactive X chromosome (Xi), but compromise of Xi heterochromatin in some cancers may signal broader deficits of nuclear heterochromatin. The debated link between BRCA1 and Xi might reflect a general relationship between BRCA1 and heterochromatin, which could connect BRCA1 to both epigenetic and genetic instability. We suggest that heterochromatic instability is a common but largely unexplored mechanism, leading to widespread genomic misregulation and the evolution of some cancers.</p>

	]]>
</description>

<author>Gayle Jeannette Pageau et al.</author>


<category>Breast Neoplasms</category>

<category>Chromosomes, Human, X</category>

<category>Female</category>

<category>Genes, BRCA1</category>

<category>Heterochromatin</category>

<category>Humans</category>

<category>Ovarian Neoplasms</category>

<category>Sex Chromatin</category>

</item>






<item>
<title>X-inactivation reveals epigenetic anomalies in most hESC but identifies sublines that initiate as expected</title>
<link>http://escholarship.umassmed.edu/lawrence/3</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://escholarship.umassmed.edu/lawrence/3</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 15 Mar 2011 06:28:04 PDT</pubDate>
<description>
	<![CDATA[
	<p>The clinical and research value of human embryonic stem cells (hESC) depends upon maintaining their epigenetically naive, fully undifferentiated state. Inactivation of one X chromosome in each cell of mammalian female embryos is a paradigm for one of the earliest steps in cell specialization through formation of facultative heterochromatin. Mouse ES cells are derived from the inner cell mass (ICM) of blastocyst stage embryos prior to X-inactivation, and cultured murine ES cells initiate this process only upon differentiation. Less is known about human X-inactivation during early development. To identify a human ES cell model for X-inactivation and study differences in the epigenetic state of hESC lines, we investigated X-inactivation in all growth competent, karyotypically normal, NIH approved, female hESC lines and several sublines. In the vast majority of undifferentiated cultures of nine lines examined, essentially all cells exhibit hallmarks of X-inactivation. However, subcultures of any hESC line can vary in X-inactivation status, comprising distinct sublines. Importantly, we identified rare sublines that have not yet inactivated Xi and retain competence to undergo X-inactivation upon differentiation. Other sublines exhibit defects in counting or maintenance of XIST expression on Xi. The few hESC sublines identified that have not yet inactivated Xi may reflect the earlier epigenetic state of the human ICM and represent the most promising source of NIH hESC for study of human X-inactivation. The many epigenetic anomalies seen indicate that maintenance of fully unspecialized cells, which have not formed Xi facultative heterochromatin, is a delicate epigenetic balance difficult to maintain in culture.</p>

	]]>
</description>

<author>Lisa L. Hall et al.</author>


<category>Animals</category>

<category>*Cell Differentiation</category>

<category>*Cell Line</category>

<category>Chromosomes, Human, X</category>

<category>Dosage Compensation, Genetic</category>

<category>Embryonic Stem Cells</category>

<category>*Epigenesis, Genetic</category>

<category>Female</category>

<category>Humans</category>

<category>Mice</category>

<category>RNA, Untranslated</category>

<category>*X Chromosome Inactivation</category>

</item>






<item>
<title>Changing nuclear landscape and unique PML structures during early epigenetic transitions of human embryonic stem cells</title>
<link>http://escholarship.umassmed.edu/lawrence/2</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://escholarship.umassmed.edu/lawrence/2</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 15 Mar 2011 06:28:03 PDT</pubDate>
<description>
	<![CDATA[
	<p>The complex nuclear structure of somatic cells is important to epigenomic regulation, yet little is known about nuclear organization of human embryonic stem cells (hESC). Here we surveyed several nuclear structures in pluripotent and transitioning hESC. Observations of centromeres, telomeres, SC35 speckles, Cajal Bodies, lamin A/C and emerin, nuclear shape and size demonstrate a very different "nuclear landscape" in hESC. This landscape is remodeled during a brief transitional window, concomitant with or just prior to differentiation onset. Notably, hESC initially contain abundant signal for spliceosome assembly factor, SC35, but lack discrete SC35 domains; these form as cells begin to specialize, likely reflecting cell-type specific genomic organization. Concomitantly, nuclear size increases and shape changes as lamin A/C and emerin incorporate into the lamina. During this brief window, hESC exhibit dramatically different PML-defined structures, which in somatic cells are linked to gene regulation and cancer. Unlike the numerous, spherical somatic PML bodies, hES cells often display approximately 1-3 large PML structures of two morphological types: long linear "rods" or elaborate "rosettes", which lack substantial SUMO-1, Daxx, and Sp100. These occur primarily between Day 0-2 of differentiation and become rare thereafter. PML rods may be "taut" between other structures, such as centromeres, but clearly show some relationship with the lamina, where PML often abuts or fills a "gap" in early lamin A/C staining. Findings demonstrate that pluripotent hES cells have a markedly different overall nuclear architecture, remodeling of which is linked to early epigenomic programming and involves formation of unique PML-defined structures.</p>

	]]>
</description>

<author>John T. Butler et al.</author>


<category>Cell Nucleus</category>

<category>Embryonic Stem Cells</category>

<category>*Epigenesis, Genetic</category>

<category>Humans</category>

<category>Leukemia, Promyelocytic, Acute</category>

<category>Pluripotent Stem Cells</category>

</item>






<item>
<title>Aberrant silencing of cancer-related genes by CpG hypermethylation occurs independently of their spatial organization in the nucleus</title>
<link>http://escholarship.umassmed.edu/lawrence/1</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://escholarship.umassmed.edu/lawrence/1</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 15 Mar 2011 06:28:00 PDT</pubDate>
<description>
	<![CDATA[
	<p>Aberrant promoter DNA-hypermethylation and repressive chromatin constitutes a frequent mechanism of gene inactivation in cancer. There is great interest in dissecting the mechanisms underlying this abnormal silencing. Studies have shown changes in the nuclear organization of chromatin in tumor cells as well as the association of aberrant methylation with long-range silencing of neighboring genes. Furthermore, certain tumors show a high incidence of promoter methylation termed as the CpG island methylator phenotype. Here, we have analyzed the role of nuclear chromatin architecture for genes in hypermethylated inactive versus nonmethylated active states and its relation with long-range silencing and CpG island methylator phenotype. Using combined immunostaining for active/repressive chromatin marks and fluorescence in situ hybridization in colorectal cancer cell lines, we show that aberrant silencing of these genes occurs without requirement for their being positioned at heterochromatic domains. Importantly, hypermethylation, even when associated with long-range epigenetic silencing of neighboring genes, occurs independent of their euchromatic or heterochromatic location. Together, these results indicate that, in cancer, extensive changes around promoter chromatin of individual genes or gene clusters could potentially occur locally without preference for nuclear position and/or causing repositioning. These findings have important implications for understanding relationships between nuclear organization and gene expression patterns in cancer.</p>

	]]>
</description>

<author>Hariharan P. Easwaran et al.</author>


<category>Adaptor Proteins, Signal Transducing</category>

<category>Cell Line, Tumor</category>

<category>Cell Nucleus</category>

<category>CpG Islands</category>

<category>DNA Methylation</category>

<category>Epigenesis, Genetic</category>

<category>Gene Expression Profiling</category>

<category>Gene Expression Regulation, Neoplastic</category>

<category>*Gene Silencing</category>

<category>Genome-Wide Association Study</category>

<category>Humans</category>

<category>In Situ Hybridization</category>

<category>In Situ Hybridization, Fluorescence</category>

<category>Intercellular Adhesion Molecule-1</category>

<category>Microsatellite Repeats</category>

<category>Neoplasms</category>

<category>Nuclear Proteins</category>

<category>Proto-Oncogene Proteins</category>

<category>Reverse Transcriptase Polymerase Chain Reaction</category>

</item>





</channel>
</rss>
