Objective: To understand the experience of the informationist recipients of NLM-funded Administrative Supplements for Informationist Services and gather evidence for their impact on NIH-funded biomedical research
Methods: A mixed methods approach consisting of a survey of principal investigators and a focus group of informationists.
Results: Informationists appeared to have a positive impact on their team’s research, especially in the areas of data storage, data management planning, data organization, and literature searching. In addition, many informationists felt that their involvement increased their research skills and made them true research partners. Assessing their own impact was a challenge for the award recipients, and questions remain about the best evaluation methods. The overall experience of the informationists and researchers was mixed but largely positive.
Conclusion: The NLM-funded informationist supplement award appears to be a successful mechanism for immersing informationists into research teams and improving data management in the supported projects.
National Library of Medicine, Informationist, data management, data science
Thanks to the informationists and PIs for sharing their experiences. Thanks also to Kathel Dunn at the National Library of Medicine for her support and guidance. This research was supported by an appointment to the NLM Associate Fellowship Program sponsored by the National Library of Medicine, NIH and administered by the Oak Ridge Institute for Science and Education and by the Intramural Research Program of the U.S. National Institutes of Health, National Library of Medicine (NLM).
Deardorff, Ariel, Valerie Florance, and Alan VanBiervliet. 2016. "Assessing the National Library of Medicine’s Informationist Awards." Journal of eScience Librarianship 5(1): e1095. http://dx.doi.org/10.7191/jeslib.2016.1095
Rights and Permissions
Copyright © 2016 The Author(s).
Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-Share Alike 4.0 License.
Table 1: Research Data Management Areas of Impact
Table2_1095.png (33 kB)
Table 2: Literature Areas of Impact
Table3_1095.png (39 kB)
Table 3: Additional Needs
Appendix1_1095.pdf (488 kB)
Appendix 1: Survey Questions
Appendix2_1095.pdf (529 kB)
Appendix 2: Focus Group Questions