Objectives: The primary objectives of this study are to gauge the various levels of Research Data Service academic libraries provide based on demographic factors, gauging RDS growth since 2011, and what obstacles may prevent expansion or growth of services.
Methods: Survey of academic institutions through stratified random sample of ACRL library directors across the U.S. and Canada. Frequencies and chi-square analysis were applied, with some responses grouped into broader categories for analysis.
Results: Minimal to no change for what services were offered between survey years, and interviews with library directors were conducted to help explain this lack of change.
Conclusion: Further analysis is forthcoming for a librarians study to help explain possible discrepancies in organizational objectives and librarian sentiments of RDS.
research data service, data management, libraries and data sets
Tenopir, Carol, Dane Hughes, Suzie Allard, Mike Frame, Ben Birch, Lynn Baird, Robert Sandusky, Madison Langseth, and Andrew Lundeen. 2015. "Research Data Services in Academic Libraries: Data Intensive Roles for the Future?." Journal of eScience Librarianship 4(2): e1085. http://dx.doi.org/10.7191/jeslib.2015.1085
Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-Share Alike 4.0 License.
Figure 1. Percentage of libraries in 2014 currently offering, planning to offer, or not planning to offer RDS: Informational/consultative services
Figure2.jpg (30 kB)
Figure 2. Percentage of libraries in 2014 currently offering, planning to offer, or not planning to offer RDS: Technical services
Figure3.jpg (112 kB)
Figure 3. Percentage of libraries currently offering RDS who institutions receive less than $50 million in annual external funding versus those whose institutions receive $50 million or more in annual external funding
AppendixA1085.pdf (404 kB)
Appendix A. Survey Instrument
AppendixB1085.pdf (240 kB)
Appendix B. Interview Template & Informed Consent Sheet