Title

Variation of Adenoma Prevalence by Age, Sex, Race, and Colon Location in a Large Population: Implications for Screening and Quality Programs

UMMS Affiliation

Department of Family Medicine and Community Health; Meyers Primary Care Institute

Date

9-14-2012

Document Type

Article

Subjects

Adenoma; Colorectal Neoplasms; Colonoscopy; Prevalence

Disciplines

Community Health and Preventive Medicine | Digestive System Diseases | Epidemiology | Gastroenterology | Hepatology | Neoplasms | Preventive Medicine | Primary Care

Abstract

BACKGROUND and AIMS: Reliable community-based colorectal adenoma prevalence estimates are needed to inform colonoscopy quality standards and to estimate patient colorectal cancer risks; however, minimal data exist from populations with large numbers of diverse patients and examiners.

METHODS: We evaluated the prevalence of adenomas detected by sex, age, race/ethnicity, and colon location among 20,792 Kaiser Permanente Northern California members >/=50 years of age who received a screening colonoscopy exam (102 gastroenterologists, years 2006-2008).

RESULTS: Prevalence of detected adenomas increased more rapidly with age in the proximal colon (adjusted odds ratio [OR], 2.39; 95% confidence interval [CI], 2.05-2.80; 70-74 vs 50-54 years) than in the distal colon (OR, 1.89; 95% CI, 1.63-2.19). Prevalence was higher among men vs women at all ages (OR, 1.77; 95% CI, 1.66-1.89), increasing in men from 25% to 39% at ≥70 years and in women from 15% at 50-54 years to 26% (P < .001). Proximal adenoma prevalence was higher among blacks than whites (OR, 1.26; 95% CI, 1.04-1.54), although total prevalence was similar, including for persons <60 years old (OR, 1.17; 95% CI, 0.91-1.50).

CONCLUSIONS: Prevalence of detected adenomas increases substantially with age and is much higher in men; proximal adenomas are more common among blacks than whites, although the total prevalence and the prevalence for agesvalid, without adjustment, for comparing providers serving different populations. The variation in prevalence and location may also have implications for the effectiveness of screening methods in different demographic groups.

Comments

Citation: Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2012 Sep 14. doi: 10.1016/j.cgh.2012.09.010. [Epub ahead of print]. Link to article on publisher's site

Related Resources

Link to Article in PubMed

PubMed ID

22985608