<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" ?>
<rss version="2.0">
<channel>
<title>GRACE Publications</title>
<copyright>Copyright (c) 2013 University of Massachusetts Medical School All rights reserved.</copyright>
<link>http://escholarship.umassmed.edu/cor_grace</link>
<description>Recent documents in GRACE Publications</description>
<language>en-us</language>
<lastBuildDate>Mon, 20 May 2013 07:36:29 PDT</lastBuildDate>
<ttl>3600</ttl>


	
		
	

	
		
	







<item>
<title>Treatment and outcomes of non-ST elevation acute coronary syndromes in relation to burden of pre-existing vascular disease</title>
<link>http://escholarship.umassmed.edu/cor_grace/109</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://escholarship.umassmed.edu/cor_grace/109</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 20 May 2013 07:32:10 PDT</pubDate>
<description>
	<![CDATA[
	<p>BACKGROUND: Patients with atherosclerotic disease in one territory often have disease in other vascular territories. However, the relationships between pre-existing vascular disease and the treatment and outcome of acute coronary syndrome (ACS), have not been well characterized.</p>
<p>METHODS: The Canadian ACS2, Global Registry of Acute Coronary Events (GRACE/GRACE(2)), and Canadian Registry of Acute Coronary Events (CANRACE) were used to obtain data on 10,667 non-ST segment elevation acute coronary syndrome (NSTEACS) patients between 2002 and 2008. Multivariable analysis was used to examine the relationships between the number of vascular beds affected and both in-hospital coronary angiography and in-hospital mortality. The ACS2 registry (2002-2003) included physician-reported reasons for non-invasive management, which were stratified by vascular disease burden.</p>
<p>RESULTS: Patients with more vascular disease had higher GRACE risk scores at presentation, but less frequently received antiplatelet agents and angiography. The most common reason in the ACS2 registry for patients who did not undergo angiography was "not high enough risk." There was an independent inverse relationship between the extent of vascular disease and in-hospital angiography. Patients with higher vascular disease burden had higher unadjusted in-hospital mortality. In multivariable analysis, patients with 1 vascular territory affected had the lowest and those with 3 vascular beds affected had the highest adjusted in-hospital mortality. In the ACS2 registry, patients with more extensive vascular disease had higher rates of 1-year mortality and death/re-infarction (both p for trend <0.001).</p>
<p>CONCLUSIONS: NSTEACS patients with more vascular disease received less intensive treatment, with an associated worse outcome. This undertreatment might be partly mediated by physicians' underestimation of patient risk. More aggressive risk factor modification and intensive ACS therapies may improve the outcome of these high-risk patients.</p>
<p>Copyright © 2013 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.</p>

	]]>
</description>

<author>Michael Mohareb et al.</author>


<category>Acute Coronary Syndrome</category>

<category>Atherosclerosis</category>

<category>Vascular Diseases</category>

</item>






<item>
<title>Management and outcomes of patients presenting with STEMI by use of chronic oral anticoagulation: results from the GRACE registry</title>
<link>http://escholarship.umassmed.edu/cor_grace/108</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://escholarship.umassmed.edu/cor_grace/108</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 20 May 2013 07:32:08 PDT</pubDate>
<description>
	<![CDATA[
	<p><p id="x-x-x-p-1"><strong>Aims:</strong> To describe the characteristics, treatment, and mortality in patients with ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) by use of chronic oral anticoagulant (OAC) therapy.  <p id="x-x-x-p-2"><strong>Methods:</strong> Using data from the Global Registry of Acute Coronary Syndromes (GRACE), patient characteristics, treatment, and reperfusion strategies of STEMI patients on chronic OAC are described, and relevant variables compared with patients not on chronic OAC. Six-month post-discharge mortality rates were evaluated by Cox proportional hazard models.  <p id="x-x-x-p-3"><strong>Results:</strong> Of 19,094 patients with STEMI, 574 (3.0%) were on chronic OAC at admission. Compared with OAC non-users, OAC users were older (mean age 73 vs. 65 years), more likely to be female (37 vs. 29%), were more likely to have a history of atrial fibrillation, prosthetic heart valve, venous thromboembolism, or stroke/transient ischaemic attack, had a higher mean GRACE risk score (166 vs. 145), were less likely to be Killip class I (68 vs. 82%), and were less likely to undergo catheterization/percutaneous coronary intervention (52 vs. 66%, respectively). Of the patients who underwent catheterization, fewer OAC users had the procedure done within 24 h of admission (56.5 vs. 64.5% of OAC non-users). In propensity-matched analyses (<em>n</em>=606), rates of in-hospital major bleeding and in-hospital and 6-month post-discharge mortality were similar for OAC users and OAC non-users (2.7 and 3.7%, <em>p</em>=0.64; 15 and 13%, <em>p</em>=0.56; 15 and 12%, <em>p</em>=0.47, respectively), rates of in-hospital recurrent myocardial infarction (8.6 and 2.0%, <em>p</em>p=0.004) were higher in OAC patients, and rates of 6-month stroke were lower (0.6 and 4.3%, p=0.038). Patients in both groups who underwent catheterization had lower mortality than those who did not undergo catheterization.  <p id="x-x-x-p-4"><strong>Conclusions:</strong> This is the largest study to describe the characteristics and treatment of STEMI patients on chronic OAC. The findings suggest that patients on chronic OAC are less likely to receive guideline-indicated management, but have similar adjusted rates of in-hospital and 6-month mortality.</p>

	]]>
</description>

<author>Alvaro Alonso et al.</author>


<category>Acute Coronary Syndrome</category>

<category>Myocardial Infarction</category>

<category>Anticoagulants</category>

</item>






<item>
<title>Influence of 23 coronary artery disease variants on recurrent myocardial infarction or cardiac death: the GRACE Genetics Study</title>
<link>http://escholarship.umassmed.edu/cor_grace/107</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://escholarship.umassmed.edu/cor_grace/107</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 30 Jan 2013 10:46:20 PST</pubDate>
<description>
	<![CDATA[
	<p>Aims: A pooled analysis of 14 genome-wide association studies revealed 23 susceptibility loci for coronary artery disease (CAD), thereby providing the most comprehensive genetic blueprint of CAD susceptibility. Here, we evaluated whether these 23 loci also predispose to recurrent myocardial infarction (MI) or cardiac death following an acute coronary syndrome (ACS).</p>
<p>Methods and results: A total of 2099 ACS patients enrolled in the Global Registry of Acute Coronary Events (GRACE) UK-Belgian study were prospectively followed for a median of 5 years (1668 days). C-allele carriers of the rs579459 variant, which is located upstream of the ABO gene and correlates with blood group A, were independently associated with recurrent MI [multivariable-adjusted hazard ratio (HR) 2.25, CI = 1.37-3.71; P = 0.001] and with recurrent MI or cardiac death [multivariable-adjusted (HR) 1.80, CI = 1.09-2.95; P = 0.021] within 5 years after an index ACS. The association of rs579459 was replicated in 1250 Polish patients with 6 months follow-up after an index ACS [multivariable-adjusted (HR) 2.70, CI = 1.26-5.82; P = 0.011 for recurrent MI]. Addition of rs579459 to a prediction model of 17 clinical risk factors improved risk classification for recurrent MI or cardiac death at 6 months as calculated by the integrated discrimination improvement method (P = 0.037), but not by C-statistics (P = 0.096).</p>
<p>Conclusion: In this observational study, rs579459 was independently associated with adverse cardiac outcome after ACS. A weak improvement in clinical risk prediction was also observed, suggesting that rs579459 should be further tested as a potentially relevant contributor to risk prediction models for adverse outcome following ACS.</p>

	]]>
</description>

<author>Els Wauters et al.</author>


<category>Acute Coronary Syndrome</category>

<category>Myocardial Infarction</category>

<category>Death, Sudden, Cardiac</category>

<category>Coronary Artery Disease</category>

<category>Genetic Association Studies</category>

</item>






<item>
<title>Non-alcoholic fatty liver disease and outcomes in persons with acute coronary syndromes: insights from the GRACE-ALT analysis</title>
<link>http://escholarship.umassmed.edu/cor_grace/106</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://escholarship.umassmed.edu/cor_grace/106</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 28 Jan 2013 12:33:19 PST</pubDate>
<description>
	<![CDATA[
	<p><p id="x-x-p-1"><strong>Objective</strong> Non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) is associated with a higher risk of cardiovascular disease, but no data exist about the relation between NAFLD and adverse outcomes in persons with acute coronary syndromes (ACS). We evaluated elevated serum alanine aminotransferase (ALT) as a marker of NAFLD, in association adverse outcomes following ACS.   <p id="x-x-p-2"><strong>Methods</strong> We conducted a retrospective cohort study of participants enrolled in the Global Registry of Acute Coronary Events (GRACE) admitted for ACS to St Michael's Hospital, Toronto, between 1999 and 2007. Multivariable linear regression was used to determine the change in maximum measured cardiac troponin I (cTnI) per each 1 IU/l increase in serum ALT concentration. The association between an elevated ALT >90th centile, and adverse outcomes in-hospital and at 6 months were calculated using multiple logistic regression analyses, adjusting for age, sex, body mass index, serum creatinine, glucose, triglycerides and LDL-C, as well as chronic statin or other lipid-lowering agent use.    <p id="x-x-p-3"><strong>Results</strong> 528 participants were included. Each 1 IU/l increase in ALT was associated with an increase in maximum measured cTnI of 0.16 µg/l (95% CI 0.10 to 0.22). An elevated ALT concentration >90th percentile was associated with a maximum measured cTnI in the highest quartile (adjusted OR 7.07, 95% CI 1.83 to 27.37). An elevated ALT >90th percentile was also significantly associated with all-cause mortality in-hospital, and up to 6 months after discharge (adjusted OR 8.96, 95% CI 3.28 to 24.49).    <p id="x-x-p-4"><strong>Conclusions</strong> NAFLD, determined by an elevated serum ALT, is associated with a higher risk of adverse outcomes in persons with ACS. Whether ALT is a valid and independent prognostic marker in ACS remains to be determined.</p>

	]]>
</description>

<author>Lavanya Ravichandran et al.</author>


<category>Fatty Liver</category>

<category>Acute Coronary Syndrome</category>

</item>






<item>
<title>Young patients hospitalized with an acute coronary syndrome</title>
<link>http://escholarship.umassmed.edu/cor_grace/105</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://escholarship.umassmed.edu/cor_grace/105</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 21 Nov 2012 11:01:09 PST</pubDate>
<description>
	<![CDATA[
	<p>OBJECTIVES: Limited data are available describing the magnitude, clinical features, treatment practices, and short-term outcomes of younger adults hospitalized with an acute coronary syndrome (ACS).</p>
<p>METHODS: The objectives of this large multinational observational study were to describe recent trends in these and related endpoints among adult men and women younger than 55 years of age who were hospitalized with an ACS between 1999 and 2007 as part of the Global Registry of Acute Coronary Events (GRACE) study.</p>
<p>RESULTS: The overall proportion of young adults hospitalized with an ACS in our multinational study population was 23% (n=15 052 of 65 119); this proportion remained relatively constant during the years under study. The proportion of comparatively young patients hospitalized with a previous diagnosis of angina pectoris or heart failure decreased over time, whereas the rates of previously diagnosed hypertension in this patient population increased. The proportion of patients developing atrial fibrillation, heart failure, stroke, or an episode of major bleeding during hospitalization for an ACS decreased significantly over time. Both in-hospital (2.1% in 1999; 1.3% in 2007) and 30-day multivariable-adjusted death rates decreased by more than 30% (odds ratio=0.66, 95% confidence interval=0.60-0.74) during the years under study. The hospital use of effective cardiac therapies (e.g. angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors, beta-blockers) increased significantly over time.</p>
<p>CONCLUSION: The results of this large observational study provide insights into the magnitude, changing characteristics, and short-term outcomes of comparatively young adults hospitalized with an ACS. Decreasing rates of short-term mortality and important clinical complications likely reflect enhanced treatment efforts that warrant future monitoring.</p>

	]]>
</description>

<author>Hamza H. Awad et al.</author>


<category>Acute Coronary Syndrome</category>

</item>






<item>
<title>Trends in atrial fibrillation in patients hospitalized with an acute coronary syndrome</title>
<link>http://escholarship.umassmed.edu/cor_grace/104</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://escholarship.umassmed.edu/cor_grace/104</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 09 Nov 2012 08:09:38 PST</pubDate>
<description>
	<![CDATA[
	<p>BACKGROUND: Atrial fibrillation is common among patients with cardiovascular disease and is a frequent complication of the acute coronary syndrome. Data are needed on recent trends in the magnitude, clinical features, treatment, and prognostic impact of preexisting and new-onset atrial fibrillation in patients hospitalized with an acute coronary syndrome.</p>
<p>METHODS: The study population consisted of 59,032 patients hospitalized with an acute coronary syndrome at 113 sites in the Global Registry of Acute Coronary Events Study between 2000 and 2007.</p>
<p>RESULTS: A total of 4494 participants (7.6%) with acute coronary syndrome reported a history of atrial fibrillation and 3112 participants (5.3%) developed new-onset atrial fibrillation during their hospitalization. Rates of new-onset atrial fibrillation (5.5%-4.5%) and preexisting atrial fibrillation (7.4%-6.7%) declined during the study. Preexisting atrial fibrillation was associated with older age and greater cardiovascular disease burden, whereas new-onset atrial fibrillation was closely related to the severity of the index acute coronary syndrome. Patients with atrial fibrillation were less likely than patients without atrial fibrillation to receive evidence-based therapies and more likely to develop in-hospital complications, including heart failure. Overall hospital death rates in patients with new-onset and preexisting atrial fibrillation were 14.5% and 8.9%, respectively, compared with 1.2% in those without atrial fibrillation. Short-term death rates in patients with atrial fibrillation declined over the study period.</p>
<p>CONCLUSIONS: Despite a reduction in the rates of, and mortality from, atrial fibrillation, this arrhythmia exerts a significant adverse effect on survival among patients hospitalized with an acute coronary syndrome. Opportunities exist to improve the identification and treatment of patients with acute coronary syndrome with, or at risk for, atrial fibrillation to reduce the incidence and resultant complications of this dysrhythmia.</p>

	]]>
</description>

<author>David D. McManus et al.</author>


<category>Atrial Fibrillation</category>

<category>Acute Coronary Syndrome</category>

<category>Hospitalization</category>

<category>Outcome Assessment (Health Care)</category>

</item>






<item>
<title>Risk-Prediction Model for Ischemic Stroke in Patients Hospitalized With an Acute Coronary Syndrome (from the Global Registry of Acute Coronary Events [GRACE])</title>
<link>http://escholarship.umassmed.edu/cor_grace/103</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://escholarship.umassmed.edu/cor_grace/103</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 03 Aug 2012 12:51:54 PDT</pubDate>
<description>
	<![CDATA[
	<p>The risk of stroke in patients hospitalized with an acute coronary syndrome (ACS) ranges from <1% to ≥2.5%. The aim of this study was to develop a simple predictive tool for bedside risk estimation of in-hospital ischemic stroke in patients with ACS to help guide clinicians in the acute management of these high-risk patients. Data were obtained from 63,118 patients enrolled from April 1999 to December 2007 in the Global Registry of Acute Coronary Events (GRACE), a multinational registry involving 126 hospitals in 14 countries. A regression model was developed to predict the occurrence of in-hospital ischemic stroke in patients hospitalized with an ACS. The main study outcome was the development of ischemic stroke during the index hospitalization for an ACS. Eight risk factors for stroke were identified: older age, atrial fibrillation on index electrocardiogram, positive initial cardiac biomarkers, presenting systolic blood pressure ≥160 mm Hg, ST-segment change on index electrocardiogram, no history of smoking, higher Killip class, and lower body weight (c-statistic 0.7). The addition of coronary artery bypass graft surgery and percutaneous coronary intervention into the model increased the prediction of stroke risk. In conclusion, the GRACE stroke risk score is a simple tool for predicting in-hospital ischemic stroke risk in patients admitted for the entire spectrum of ACS, which is widely applicable to patients in various hospital settings and will assist in the management of high-risk patients with ACS.</p>
<p>Copyright © 2012 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.</p>

	]]>
</description>

<author>Kay Lee Park et al.</author>


<category>Acute Coronary Syndrome</category>

<category>Stroke</category>

</item>






<item>
<title>Management and Outcome of Acute Coronary Syndrome Patients in Relation to Prior History of Atrial Fibrillation</title>
<link>http://escholarship.umassmed.edu/cor_grace/102</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://escholarship.umassmed.edu/cor_grace/102</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 18 Apr 2012 08:46:05 PDT</pubDate>
<description>
	<![CDATA[
	<p>BACKGROUND: The prognostic impact of atrial fibrillation (AF) in the setting of acute coronary syndrome (ACS) is controversial. Furthermore, there are limited real-world data on the management of ACS patients with history of AF.</p>
<p>METHODS: The Global Registry of Acute Coronary Events (GRACE/GRACE2) and Canadian Registry of Acute Coronary Events (CANRACE) enrolled 14,285 patients across Canada between 1999 and 2008. Patients were stratified by the presence of history of AF. We compared clinical characteristics, medical therapies, cardiac procedures, and clinical outcomes between the 2 groups.</p>
<p>RESULTS: Overall, 1333 of the enrolled patients (9.3%) had history of AF, of whom 51.5% presented with non-ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction, 29.5% with unstable angina, and 19.1% with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction. Compared with the group without, patients with a history of AF less frequently received evidence-based antiplatelet and antithrombin therapies, left ventricle ejection fraction assessment, and coronary angiography (all P < 0.001); they also had higher unadjusted rates of in-hospital death, myocardial (re)infarction, and heart failure. However, in multivariable analysis, history of AF was not found to be independently associated with in-hospital mortality (adjusted odds ratio [OR] = 1.12; 95% confidence interval (CI), 0.73-1.73; P = 0.61) or death and/or myocardial reinfarction (adjusted OR = 1.15; 95% CI, 0.87-1.5; P = 0.34).</p>
<p>CONCLUSIONS: History of AF is common among ACS patients. They received less evidence-based medical and invasive therapies than ACS patients without history of AF. History of AF is a negative independent predictor of in-hospital coronary angiography but was not found to be independently associated with adverse outcomes. All rights reserved.</p>

	]]>
</description>

<author>Darar Al Khdair et al.</author>


<category>Acute Coronary Syndrome</category>

<category>Atrial Fibrillation</category>

</item>






<item>
<title>Temporal Patterns of Lipid Testing and Statin Therapy in Acute Coronary Syndrome Patients (from the Canadian GRACE Experience)</title>
<link>http://escholarship.umassmed.edu/cor_grace/101</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://escholarship.umassmed.edu/cor_grace/101</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 18 Apr 2012 08:46:03 PDT</pubDate>
<description>
	<![CDATA[
	<p>Current guidelines recommend the measurement of fasting lipid profile and use of statins in all patients with acute coronary syndrome (ACS). However, the temporal trends of lipid testing and statin therapy in "real-world" patients with ACS are unclear. From January 1999 through December 2008, the prospective, multicenter, Global Registry of Acute Coronary Events (GRACE/GRACE(2)/CANRACE) enrolled 13,947 patients with ACS in Canada. We stratified the study population based on year of presentation into 3 groups (1999 to 2004, 2005 to 2006, and 2007 to 2008) and compared the use of lipid testing and use of statin therapy in hospital. Overall, 70.8% of patients underwent lipid testing and 79.4% received in-hospital statin therapy; these patients were younger and had lower GRACE risk scores (p 130 mg/dl (3.4 mmol/L) were more likely to be treated with in-hospital statins. In conclusion, there has been a significant temporal increase in the use of in-hospital statin therapy but only a minor increase in lipid testing. Lipid testing was strongly associated with in-hospital statin use. A substantial proportion of patients with ACS, especially those at higher risk, still do not receive these guideline-recommended interventions in contemporary practice.</p>

	]]>
</description>

<author>Basem Elbarouni et al.</author>


<category>Acute Coronary Syndrome</category>

<category>Lipids</category>

<category>Hydroxymethylglutaryl-CoA Reductase Inhibitors</category>

</item>






<item>
<title>Incidence, prognosis, and factors associated with cardiac arrest in patients hospitalized with acute coronary syndromes (the Global Registry of Acute Coronary Events Registry)</title>
<link>http://escholarship.umassmed.edu/cor_grace/100</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://escholarship.umassmed.edu/cor_grace/100</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 27 Feb 2012 06:15:53 PST</pubDate>
<description>
	<![CDATA[
	<p>OBJECTIVES: Contemporary data are lacking with respect to the incidence rates of, factors associated with, and impact of cardiac arrest from ventricular fibrillation or tachycardia (VF-CA) on hospital survival in patients admitted with an acute coronary syndrome (ACS). The objectives of this multinational study were to characterize trends in the magnitude of in-hospital VF-CA complicating an ACS and to describe its impact over time on hospital prognosis.</p>
<p>METHODS: In 59,161 patients enrolled in the Global Registry of Acute Coronary Events Study between 2000 and 2007, we determined the incidence, prognosis, and factors associated with VF-CA.</p>
<p>RESULTS: Overall, 3618 patients (6.2%) developed VF-CA during their hospitalization for an ACS. Incidence rates of VF-CA declined over time. Patients who experienced VF-CA were on average older and had a greater burden of cardiovascular disease, yet were less likely to receive evidence-based cardiac therapies than patients in whom VF-CA did not occur. Hospital death rates were 55.3% and 1.5% in patients with and without VF-CA, respectively. There was a greater than 50% decline in the hospital death rates associated with VF-CA during the years under study. Patients with a VF-CA occurring after 48 h were at especially high risk for dying during hospitalization (82.8%).</p>
<p>CONCLUSION: Despite reductions in the magnitude of, and short-term mortality from, VF-CA, VF-CA continues to exert an adverse effect on survival among patients hospitalized with an ACS. Opportunities exist to improve the identification and treatment of ACS patients at risk for VF-CA to reduce the incidence of, and mortality from, this serious arrhythmic disturbance.</p>

	]]>
</description>

<author>David D. McManus et al.</author>


<category>Acute Coronary Syndrome</category>

<category>Heart Arrest</category>

<category>Ventricular Fibrillation</category>

<category>Tachycardia</category>

</item>






<item>
<title>Acute coronary syndromes without chest pain, an underdiagnosed and undertreated high-risk group: insights from the Global Registry of Acute Coronary Events. 2004</title>
<link>http://escholarship.umassmed.edu/cor_grace/99</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://escholarship.umassmed.edu/cor_grace/99</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 07 Feb 2012 07:49:22 PST</pubDate>
<description>
	<![CDATA[
	<p>STUDY OBJECTIVES: The clinical manifestations of acute coronary  syndromes (ACSs) vary, and patients present frequently with symptoms  other than chest pain. In this analysis, a large contemporary database  has been accessed to define the frequency, clinical characteristics, and  outcomes of patients presenting without chest pain across different  diagnostic categories of ACS.</p>
<p>DESIGN AND SETTING: The Global Registry of Acute Coronary Events is a  multinational, prospective, observational study involving 14 countries.</p>
<p>PATIENTS: Patients presenting to the hospital with a suspected ACS  were stratified according to whether their predominant presenting  symptoms included chest pain (ie, typical) or did not (ie, atypical).  Demographics, medical history, hospital management, and outcomes were  compared.</p>
<p>MEASUREMENTS AND RESULTS: Of the 20,881 patients in this analysis,  1,763 (8.4%) presented without chest pain, 23.8% of whom were not  initially recognized as having an ACS. They were less likely to receive  effective cardiac medications, and experienced greater hospital  morbidity and mortality (13% vs 4.3%, respectively; p < 0.0001) than  did patients with typical symptoms. After adjusting for potentially  confounding variables, increased hospital mortality rates were noted in  patients with dominant presenting symptoms of presyncope/syncope (odds  ratio [OR], 2.0; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.4 to 2.9), nausea or  vomiting (OR, 1.6; 95% CI, 1.1 to 2.4), and dyspnea (OR, 1.4; 95% CI,  1.1 to 1.9), and in those with painless presentations of unstable angina  (OR, 2.2; 95% CI, 1.4 to 3.5) and ST-segment elevation myocardial  infarction (OR, 1.7; 95% CI, 1.2 to 2.2).</p>
<p>CONCLUSION: Patients with ACSs who present without chest pain are  frequently misdiagnosed and undertreated. With the exception of  diaphoresis, each dominant presenting symptom independently identifies a  population that is at increased risk of dying. These patients  experience greater morbidity and a higher mortality across the spectrum  of ACSs.</p>

	]]>
</description>

<author>David Brieger et al.</author>


<category>Acute Disease</category>

<category>Chest Pain</category>

<category>Coronary Disease</category>

<category>Diagnostic Errors</category>

<category>History, 20th Century</category>

<category>Humans</category>

<category>Medical Receptionists</category>

<category>Registries</category>

<category>Treatment Outcome</category>

</item>






<item>
<title>Bridging the gender gap: Insights from a contemporary analysis of sex-related differences in the treatment and outcomes of patients with acute coronary syndromes</title>
<link>http://escholarship.umassmed.edu/cor_grace/98</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://escholarship.umassmed.edu/cor_grace/98</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 03 Feb 2012 07:09:46 PST</pubDate>
<description>
	<![CDATA[
	<p>BACKGROUND: The question of whether gender-related disparities still exist in the treatment and outcomes of patients presenting with acute coronary syndromes (ACS) remains controversial. Using data from 4 registries spanning a decade, we sought to determine whether sex-related differences have persisted over time and to examine the treating physician's rationale for adopting a conservative management strategy in women compared with men.</p>
<p>METHODS: From 1999 to 2008, 14,196 Canadian patients with non-ST-segment elevation ACS were recruited into the Acute Coronary Syndrome I (ACSI), ACSII, Global Registry of Acute Coronary Events (GRACE/GRACE(2)), and Canadian Registry of Acute Coronary Events (CANRACE) prospective multicenter registries.</p>
<p>RESULTS: Women in the study population were found to be significantly older than men and were more likely to have a history of heart failure, diabetes, or hypertension. Fewer women were treated with thienopyridines, heparin, and glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitors compared with men in GRACE and CANRACE. Female gender was independently associated with a lower in-hospital use of coronary angiography (adjusted odds ratio 0.76, 95% CI 0.69-0.84, P < .001) and higher in-hospital mortality (adjusted odds ratio 1.26, 95% CI 1.02-1.56, P = .036), irrespective of age (P for interaction =.76). Underestimation of patient risk was the most common reason for not pursuing an invasive strategy in both men and women.</p>
<p>CONCLUSIONS: Despite temporal increases in the use of invasive cardiac procedures, women with ACS are still more likely to be treated conservatively, which may be due to underestimation of patient risk. Furthermore, they have worse in-hospital outcomes. Greater awareness of this paradox may assist in bridging the gap between current guidelines and management practices.</p>

	]]>
</description>

<author>Stephanie Poon et al.</author>


<category>Acute Coronary Syndrome</category>

<category>Disease Management</category>

<category>Sex Factors</category>

<category>Treatment Outcomes</category>

<category>Healthcare Disparities</category>

</item>






<item>
<title>Reperfusion Strategies and Outcomes of ST-Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction Patients in Canada: Observations From the Global Registry of Acute Coronary Events (GRACE) and the Canadian Registry of Acute Coronary Events (CANRACE)</title>
<link>http://escholarship.umassmed.edu/cor_grace/97</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://escholarship.umassmed.edu/cor_grace/97</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 03 Feb 2012 07:09:43 PST</pubDate>
<description>
	<![CDATA[
	<p>BACKGROUND: We examine the clinical characteristics and outcomes of ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) patients receiving various reperfusion therapies in 2 contemporary Canadian registries.</p>
<p>METHODS: Of 4045 STEMI patients, 2024 received reperfusion therapy and had complete data on invasive management. They were stratified by reperfusion strategy used: primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) (n =716); fibrinolysis with rescue PCI (n =177); fibrinolysis with urgent/elective PCI (n =210); and fibrinolysis without PCI (n =921). Data were collected on clinical and laboratory findings, and outcomes.</p>
<p>RESULTS: Compared with fibrinolytic-treated patients, patients treated with primary PCI were younger and had higher Killip class, had longer time to delivery of reperfusion therapy, and utilized more antiplatelet therapy but less heparin, beta-blockers and angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors. In-hospital death occurred in 2.7% of patients treated with primary PCI, 1.7% fibrinolysis-rescue PCI, 1.0% fibrinolysis-urgent/elective PCI, and 4.8% fibrinolysis-alone (P =0.009); the rates of death/reinfarction were 3.9%, 4.0%, 4.3%, and 7.1% (P =0.032), respectively. The rate of shock was highest in the primary PCI group. Rates of heart failure or major bleeding were similar in the 4 groups. In multivariable analysis, no PCI during hospitalization was associated with death and reinfarction (adjusted odds ratio = 1.66; 95% confidence interval, 1.03-2.70; P =0.04).</p>
<p>CONCLUSIONS: Clinical features, time to reperfusion, and medication utilization differed with respect to the reperfusion strategy. While low rates of re-infarction/death were observed, these complications occurred more frequently in those who did not undergo PCI during index hospitalization. Inc. All rights reserved.</p>

	]]>
</description>

<author>Andrew Czarnecki et al.</author>


<category>Myocardial Infarction</category>

<category>Myocardial Reperfusion</category>

</item>






<item>
<title>Relation between previous Angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor use and in-hospital outcomes in acute coronary syndromes</title>
<link>http://escholarship.umassmed.edu/cor_grace/96</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://escholarship.umassmed.edu/cor_grace/96</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 03 Feb 2012 07:09:39 PST</pubDate>
<description>
	<![CDATA[
	<p>Angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitor use in patients at high risk of coronary artery disease has been associated with a decrease in the risk of myocardial infarction (MI) and death. However, it is unclear whether chronic use of these agents modifies the course and outcome of an acute coronary syndrome (ACS). This study assessed the association between chronic use of ACE inhibitors and clinical outcomes in patients with ACS. From 1999 through 2008, 13,632 Canadian patients with ACS were identified in the Global Registry of Acute Coronary Events (GRACE), the expanded GRACE (GRACE(2)), and the Canadian Registry of Acute Coronary Events (CANRACE). Patients were stratified by previous use of an ACE inhibitor. Clinical characteristics, in-hospital treatment, and outcomes were compared between the 2 groups. Multivariable logistic regression analysis adjusting for GRACE risk score and other clinical factors was performed. Patients receiving an ACE inhibitor before the ACS had a higher prevalence of diabetes (40.6% vs 21.2%, p <0.001), previous MI (51.8% vs 23.3%, p <0.001), heart failure (18.0% vs 6.9%), and higher GRACE scores at presentation (133 vs 124, p <0.001). Multivariable analysis demonstrated no significant association between previous ACE inhibitor use and death (adjusted odds ratio [OR] 1.15, confidence interval [CI] 0.90 to 1.49, p = 0.27), in-hospital re-MI (adjusted OR 0.99, CI 0.78 to 1.25, p = 0.91), or the composite end point of death/re-MI (adjusted OR 1.01, CI 0.84 to 1.20, p = 0.94). In conclusion, previous use of an ACE inhibitor is not independently associated with improved in-hospital outcomes after an ACS.</p>

	]]>
</description>

<author>Sheldon M. Singh et al.</author>


<category>Acute Coronary Syndrome</category>

<category>Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme Inhibitors</category>

</item>






<item>
<title>Comparison of acute coronary syndrome in patients receiving versus not receiving chronic dialysis (from the Global Registry of Acute Coronary Events [GRACE] Registry)</title>
<link>http://escholarship.umassmed.edu/cor_grace/95</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://escholarship.umassmed.edu/cor_grace/95</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 03 Feb 2012 07:09:35 PST</pubDate>
<description>
	<![CDATA[
	<p>Patients with end-stage renal disease commonly develop acute coronary syndromes (ACS). Little is known about the natural history of ACS in patients receiving dialysis. We evaluated the presentation, management, and outcomes of patients with ACS who were receiving dialysis before presentation for an ACS and were enrolled in the Global Registry of Acute Coronary Events (GRACE) at 123 hospitals in 14 countries from 1999 to 2007. Of 55,189 patients, 579 were required dialysis at presentation. Non-ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction was the most common ACS presentation in patients receiving dialysis, occurring in 50% (290 of 579) of patients versus 33% (17,955 of 54,610) of those not receiving dialysis. Patients receiving dialysis had greater in-hospital mortality rates (12% vs 4.8%; p <0.0001) and, among those who survived to discharge, greater 6-month mortality rates (13% vs 4.2%; p <0.0001), recurrent myocardial infarction (7.6% vs 2.9%; p <0.0001), and unplanned rehospitalization (31% vs 18%; p <0.0001). The outcome in patients receiving dialysis was worse than that predicted by their calculated GRACE risk score for in-hospital mortality (7.8% predicted vs 12% observed; p <0.05), 6-month mortality/myocardial infarction (10% predicted vs 21% observed; p <0.05). In conclusion, in the present large multinational study, approximately 1% of patients with ACS were receiving dialysis. They were more likely to present with non-ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction, and had markedly greater in-hospital and 6-month mortality. The GRACE risk score underestimated the risk of major events in patients receiving dialysis.</p>

	]]>
</description>

<author>Hitinder S. Gurm et al.</author>


<category>Acute Coronary Syndrome</category>

<category>Renal Dialysis</category>

</item>






<item>
<title>The Association Between Prior Use of Aspirin and/or Warfarin and the In-hospital Management and Outcomes in Patients Presenting With Acute Coronary Syndromes: Insights From the Global Registry of Acute Coronary Events (GRACE)</title>
<link>http://escholarship.umassmed.edu/cor_grace/94</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://escholarship.umassmed.edu/cor_grace/94</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 03 Feb 2012 07:09:31 PST</pubDate>
<description>
	<![CDATA[
	<p>BACKGROUND: The role of acetylsalicylic acid (ASA [aspirin]) and warfarin in secondary prevention after acute coronary syndromes (ACS) is well established. However, there are sparse data comparing the presentation and outcomes of patients who present with ACS while on ASA and/or warfarin therapy and those on neither.</p>
<p>METHODS: Using data from the Canadian Global Registry of Acute Coronary Events (GRACE), we stratified 14,090 ACS patients into 4 groups according to prior use of antithrombotic therapies and compared in-hospital management and outcomes.</p>
<p>RESULTS: Among 14,090 ACS patients, 7411 (52.6%) were not on prior ASA or warfarin therapy, 5724 (40.6%) were on ASA only, 593 (4.2%) were on warfarin only, and 362 (2.6%) were on both ASA and warfarin. ACS patients taking ASA and/or warfarin were older with more comorbidities than the patients on neither drug. Patients receiving prior warfarin only or ASA and warfarin were less likely to receive guideline-recommended therapies. Patients who were taking prior warfarin only had higher unadjusted rates of death, death and/or reinfarction (re-MI), congestive heart failure (CHF), and major bleeding as compared with patients on no prior therapy. Furthermore, patients who were taking ASA and warfarin had higher unadjusted rates of death and/or re-MI and CHF than patients on prior ASA only.</p>
<p>CONCLUSIONS: ACS patients on prior warfarin are a high-risk population, yet they receive less guideline-recommended therapies and have higher unadjusted adverse event rates during their index hospitalization. With the increasing use of oral anticoagulants, clinical trials are needed to guide the optimal management of these ACS patients. Inc. All rights reserved.</p>

	]]>
</description>

<author>Hani Amad et al.</author>


<category>Acute Coronary Syndrome</category>

<category>Aspirin</category>

<category>Warfarin</category>

<category>Treatment Outcome</category>

</item>






<item>
<title>Rationale and design of the GRACE (Global Registry of Acute Coronary Events) Project: a multinational registry of patients hospitalized with acute coronary syndromes</title>
<link>http://escholarship.umassmed.edu/cor_grace/92</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://escholarship.umassmed.edu/cor_grace/92</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 07 Oct 2011 05:54:45 PDT</pubDate>
<description>
	<![CDATA[
	<p>BACKGROUND: Acute coronary syndromes (ACS), including the spectrum of conditions from unstable angina to ST segment elevation myocardial infarction, represent a major cause of morbidity and mortality throughout the world. GRACE (the Global Registry of Acute Coronary Events) is a large, prospective, multinational observational study of patients hospitalized with ACS. The aim of GRACE is to improve the quality of care for patients with ACS by describing differences in, and relationships between, patient characteristics, treatment practices, and in-hospital and postdischarge outcomes at hospitals around the world. A goal of this study is to study approximately 10,000 patients with ACS on an annual basis.</p>
<p>METHODS: A total of 18 cluster sites in 14 countries in North America, South America, Europe, Australia, and New Zealand are currently collaborating in GRACE. Clusters were chosen on the basis of local demographic characteristics and hospital facilities to ensure a representative sample of patients with ACS from each country. Patients are identified by use of either active or passive surveillance approaches. A standardized core case report form is completed for all patients. Information on patient demographics, medical history, acute symptoms, clinical characteristics, electrocardiographic findings, treatment approaches, and in-hospital outcomes is collected. Patients are followed up at 6 months after hospital discharge to identify recurrent coronary events, use of various medications, and mortality.</p>
<p>CONCLUSIONS: The information collected from the GRACE project will provide important and extensive insights into patient demographic and clinical characteristics, current practice patterns, and outcomes for patients with ACS from a number of countries throughout the world. Given the pressures of practicing evidence-based medicine, the results of GRACE should provide a multinational perspective into these important outcomes and identify practice variations that will allow new opportunities to improve patient care.</p>

	]]>
</description>

<author>GRACE Investigators</author>


<category>Acute Disease</category>

<category>Australia</category>

<category>Clinical Trials as Topic</category>

<category>Coronary Disease</category>

<category>Europe</category>

<category>Hospitalization</category>

<category>Humans</category>

<category>Incidence</category>

<category>New Zealand</category>

<category>North America</category>

<category>Prevalence</category>

<category>Prospective Studies</category>

<category>*Registries</category>

<category>Research</category>

<category>South America</category>

<category>Survival Rate</category>

<category>Syndrome</category>

</item>






<item>
<title>Outcomes with the use of glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitors in non-ST-segment elevation acute coronary syndromes</title>
<link>http://escholarship.umassmed.edu/cor_grace/91</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://escholarship.umassmed.edu/cor_grace/91</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 07 Oct 2011 05:54:43 PDT</pubDate>
<description>
	<![CDATA[
	<p>OBJECTIVE: To compare the characteristics, management, and outcomes of patients with non-ST-segment elevation acute coronary syndromes (NSTE ACS) who would have been eligible for inclusion in clinical trials of glycoprotein (GP) IIb/IIIa inhibitors with those of ineligible patients.</p>
<p>DESIGN: Multinational, prospective, observational study (GRACE, Global Registry of Acute Coronary Events).</p>
<p>SETTING: Patients hospitalised for a suspected acute coronary syndrome and enrolled in GRACE between April 1999 and December 2004.</p>
<p>PATIENTS: 29 039 patients with NSTE ACS.</p>
<p>MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Characteristics and outcomes were compared for trial-eligible (75.0%) and trial-ineligible (25.0%) patients.</p>
<p>RESULTS: GP IIb/IIIa inhibitors were administered to 20.0% of eligible and 15.3% of ineligible patients. Compared with eligible patients, ineligible patients who received GP IIb/IIIa inhibitors had significantly higher rates of hospital death (6.8% vs 3.7%) and major bleeding (4.9% vs 2.2%). After adjustment for their higher baseline risk, ineligible patients still experienced higher hospital death rates (adjusted odds ratio (OR) 1.60; 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.01 to 2.39), but not higher bleeding rates, than the eligible group. Use of GP IIb/IIIa inhibitors was associated with a trend towards lower 6-month mortality in eligible (OR 0.86, 95% CI 0.72 to 1.02) and ineligible (OR 0.82, 95% CI 0.65 to 1.05) patients compared with those in whom this therapy was not used.</p>
<p>CONCLUSIONS: GP IIb/IIIa inhibitors were markedly underused in the real-world population, irrespective of whether patients were trial-eligible or not. Despite the higher risk of ineligible patients, the benefits of GP IIb/IIIa inhibitors appear to be no less than in eligible patients.</p>

	]]>
</description>

<author>Omar H. Dabbous et al.</author>


<category>Acute Coronary Syndrome</category>

<category>Aged</category>

<category>Cohort Studies</category>

<category>Death, Sudden, Cardiac</category>

<category>Female</category>

<category>Hemorrhage</category>

<category>Hospitalization</category>

<category>Humans</category>

<category>Male</category>

<category>Middle Aged</category>

<category>Myocardial Infarction</category>

<category>Platelet Glycoprotein GPIIb-IIIa Complex</category>

<category>Prospective Studies</category>

<category>Risk Factors</category>

<category>Stroke</category>

<category>Treatment Outcome</category>

</item>






<item>
<title>Prehospital Delay in Patients With Acute Coronary Syndromes (from the Global Registry of Acute Coronary Events [GRACE])</title>
<link>http://escholarship.umassmed.edu/cor_grace/90</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://escholarship.umassmed.edu/cor_grace/90</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 07 Oct 2011 05:54:42 PDT</pubDate>
<description>
	<![CDATA[
	<p>Duration of delay in seeking medical care in persons with symptoms of evolving acute myocardial infarction (AMI) is of current interest given the time-dependent benefits associated with early use of coronary reperfusion approaches. The objectives of this multinational study were to describe geographic variation in the extent of and factors associated with prehospital delay in patients enrolled in the GRACE study. Data were collected from 44,695 patients hospitalized with an acute coronary syndrome in 14 countries from 2000 to 2006. The regions under study included Argentina and Brazil (n = 8,203), United States/Canada (n = 12,810), Europe (n = 19,354), and Australia/New Zealand (n = 4,328). Patients with ST-segment elevation AMI, non-ST-segment elevation AMI, and unstable angina comprised the study population. There were marked geographic differences in extent of prehospital delay in patients with ST-segment elevation AMI and those with non-ST-segment elevation AMI/unstable angina. In patients with ST-segment elevation AMI, the shortest duration of prehospital delay was observed in patients from Australia/New Zealand (median 2.2 hours), whereas patients from Argentina and Brazil delayed the longest (median 4.0 hours). Median duration of prehospital delay was shortest (2.5 hours) in patients with ST-segment elevation AMI, whereas patients with non-ST-segment elevation AMI/unstable angina showed considerably longer prehospital delay (3.1 hours). Several demographic and clinical characteristics were associated with prolonged delay overall and in the different geographic locations under study. In conclusion, results of this large multinational registry provided insights into contemporary patterns of care-seeking behavior in patients with acute coronary disease.</p>

	]]>
</description>

<author>Robert J. Goldberg et al.</author>


<category>Acute Coronary Syndrome</category>

<category>Aged</category>

<category>Electrocardiography</category>

<category>Emergency Medical Services</category>

<category>Female</category>

<category>Humans</category>

<category>Male</category>

<category>Middle Aged</category>

<category>Patient Acceptance of Health Care</category>

<category>Time Factors</category>

</item>






<item>
<title>Management and outcomes of patients with acute coronary syndromes in Australia and New Zealand, 2000-2007</title>
<link>http://escholarship.umassmed.edu/cor_grace/89</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://escholarship.umassmed.edu/cor_grace/89</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 07 Oct 2011 05:54:41 PDT</pubDate>
<description>
	<![CDATA[
	<p>OBJECTIVES: To describe temporal trends in the use of evidence-based medical therapies and management of patients with acute coronary syndromes (ACS) in Australia and New Zealand.</p>
<p>DESIGN, SETTING AND PARTICIPANTS: Our analysis of the Australian and New Zealand cohort of the Global Registry of Acute Coronary Events (GRACE) included patients with ST-segment-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) and non-ST-segment-elevation ACS (NSTEACS) enrolled continuously between January 2000 and December 2007 from 11 metropolitan and rural centres in Australia and New Zealand.</p>
<p>RESULTS: 5615 patients were included in this analysis (1723 with STEMI; 3892 with NSTEACS). During 2000-2007 there was an increase in the use of statin therapy, angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors or angiotensin receptor blockers, and thienopyridines (P < 0.0001 for each). Among patients with STEMI, there was an increase in emergency revascularisation with PCI (from 11% to 27% [P < 0.0001]), and inhospital coronary angiography (from 61% to 76% [P < 0.0001]). Among patients with NSTEACS, there was an increase in revascularisation with PCI (from 20% to 25% [P = 0.004]). Heart failure rates declined substantially among STEMI and NSTEACS patients (from 21% to 12% [P = 0.0002], and from 13% to 4% [P < 0.0001], respectively) as did rates of hospital readmission for ischaemic heart disease at 6 months (from 23% to 9% [P = 0.0001], and from 24% to 15% [P = 0.0001], respectively).</p>
<p>CONCLUSIONS: From 2000 to 2007 in Australia and New Zealand, there was a fall in inhospital events and 6-month readmissions among patients admitted with ACS. This showed an association with improved uptake of guideline-recommended medical and interventional therapies. These data suggest an overall improvement in the quality of care offered to contemporary ACS patients in Australia and New Zealand.</p>

	]]>
</description>

<author>Bernadette Aliprandi-Costa et al.</author>


<category>Acute Coronary Syndrome</category>

<category>Registries</category>

<category>Mortality</category>

<category>Treatment Outcomes</category>

<category>Australia</category>

<category>New Zealand</category>

</item>





</channel>
</rss>
