Relation of timing of cardiac catheterization to outcomes in patients with non-ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction or unstable angina pectoris enrolled in the multinational global registry of acute coronary events
Name:
Publisher version
View Source
Access full-text PDFOpen Access
View Source
Check access options
Check access options
Authors
Montalescot, GillesDabbous, Omar H.
Lim, Michael J.
Flather, Marcus D.
Mehta, Rajendra H.
GRACE Investigators
UMass Chan Affiliations
Center for Outcomes ResearchDocument Type
Journal ArticlePublication Date
2005-06-14Keywords
Age DistributionAngina, Unstable
*Electrocardiography
Female
Follow-Up Studies
*Heart Catheterization
Hospital Mortality
Humans
International Cooperation
Male
Middle Aged
Myocardial Infarction
*Registries
Retrospective Studies
Risk Factors
Severity of Illness Index
Sex Distribution
Survival Rate
Time Factors
Health Services Research
Metadata
Show full item recordAbstract
We assessed whether timing of catheterization is associated with the type of non-ST-segment elevation acute coronary syndrome and/or outcome in patients who were enrolled in the Global Registry of Acute Coronary Events. Overall, 8,853 patients who had unstable angina pectoris or non-ST-elevation myocardial infarction were categorized according to timing of catheterization: expeditive (<24 >hours), early (24 to 48 hours), and delayed (>48 hours). Patients in the delayed group were older, more frequently had previous myocardial infarction or stroke, and had a higher risk score compared with those in the expeditive and early groups (all p < or =0.001). Killip class IV at admission, non-ST-elevation myocardial infarction, and Q waves after the index electrocardiogram were more common in the expeditive group (all p <0.0001). Patients in the expeditive and early groups were treated more aggressively with medications than were those in the delayed group. The in-hospital composite end point (death, stroke, or major bleed) occurred most frequently in the expeditive group (expeditive 6.6%, early 3.9%, delayed 5.1%, p = 0.0005), as did in-hospital death (expeditive 3.5%, early 1.4%, delayed 2.0%, p <0.0001). The highest incidence of death during follow-up occurred in the delayed group (3.8% delayed vs 2.8% expeditive/early, p = 0.0210). Multivariate regression analysis suggested that expeditive catheterization was related to in-hospital death and death from time of catheterization to 6 months. We conclude that expeditive catheterization is associated with unstable presenting features that contribute significantly to the higher risk of death and death or myocardial infarction in hospital compared with patients who undergo later catheterization.Source
Am J Cardiol. 2005 Jun 15;95(12):1397-403. Link to article on publisher's siteDOI
10.1016/j.amjcard.2005.02.004Permanent Link to this Item
http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14038/27253PubMed ID
15950559Related Resources
Link to Article in PubMedae974a485f413a2113503eed53cd6c53
10.1016/j.amjcard.2005.02.004